2012
DOI: 10.1118/1.3676183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of a clustered lumpy background model for task‐based image quality assessment in x‐ray phase‐contrast mammography

Abstract: Purpose: Since the introduction of clinical x-ray phase-contrast mammography (PCM), a technique that exploits refractive-index variations to create edge enhancement at tissue boundaries, a number of optimization studies employing physical image-quality metrics have been performed. Ideally, task-based assessment of PCM would have been conducted with human readers. These studies have been limited, however, in part due to the large parameter-space of PCM system configurations and the difficulty of employing exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the intensive studies of the optimization of conventional (Johns & Yaffe, 1985) and phase-contrast (Zysk et al, 2012) mammographic imaging systems, the main known problem with this technique is that it produces a relatively high percentage of both false-positive and false-negative results (Pisano et al, 2005). A more recently introduced technique, digital tomosynthesis, generally delivers better results, mainly due to its three-dimensional (3D) imaging ability (multiple 2D slices through the breast) which reduces the effect of overlying breast tissue camouflaging focal breast masses (Ciatto et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the intensive studies of the optimization of conventional (Johns & Yaffe, 1985) and phase-contrast (Zysk et al, 2012) mammographic imaging systems, the main known problem with this technique is that it produces a relatively high percentage of both false-positive and false-negative results (Pisano et al, 2005). A more recently introduced technique, digital tomosynthesis, generally delivers better results, mainly due to its three-dimensional (3D) imaging ability (multiple 2D slices through the breast) which reduces the effect of overlying breast tissue camouflaging focal breast masses (Ciatto et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are intended to evaluate imaging systems based on the performance of some clinically relevant task. Breast mass detection has been a common diagnostic assessment task, with observer studies related to phase-contrast imaging, 1,2 computed tomography (CT) 3 and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) 4,5 having appeared over the past few years. Many of these x-ray imaging studies have employed statistical ideal observers, which provide a well-studied, tractable means of carrying out large-scale assessments in simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simulation method and initial observer-model evaluation of anatomical noise in a mammography system for free-space propagation has recently been presented. 58…”
Section: Iic4 Initial Comparison Of Phase and Absorption Contrastmentioning
confidence: 99%