Adapting the Serious Illness Conversation Guide for Unhoused Older Adults: A Rapid Qualitative Study

Abstract

Background Older adults experiencing homelessness (OAEH) age quickly and die earlier than their housed counterparts. Illness-related decisions are best guided by patients’ values, but healthcare and homelessness service providers need support in facilitating these discussions. The Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) is a communication tool to guide discussions but has not yet been adapted for OAEH. Methods We aimed to adapt the SICG for use with OAEH by nurses, social workers, and other homeless service providers. We conducted semi-structured interviews with homeless service providers and cognitive interviews with OAEH using the SICG. Service providers included nurses, social workers, or others working in homeless settings. OAEH were at least 50 years old and diagnosed with a serious illness. Interviews were conducted and audio recorded in shelters, transitional housing, a hospital, public spaces, and over Zoom. The research team reviewed transcripts, identifying common themes across transcripts and applying analytic notetaking. We summarized transcripts from each participant group, applying rapid qualitative analysis. For OAEH, data that referenced proposed adaptations or feedback about the SICG tool were grouped into two domains: “SICG interpretation” and “SICG feedback”. For providers, we used domains from the Toolkit of Adaptation Approaches: “collaborative working”, “team”, “endorsement”, “materials”, “messages”, and “delivery”. Summaries were grouped into matrices to help visualize themes to inform adaptations. The adapted guide was then reviewed by expert palliative care clinicians for further refinement. Results The final sample included 11 OAEH (45% Black, 61±7 years old) and 10 providers (80% White, 8.9± years practice). Adaptation themes included changing words and phrases to 1) increase transparency about the purpose of the conversation, 2) promote OAEH autonomy and empowerment, 3) align with nurses’ and social workers’ scope of practice regarding facilitating diagnostic and prognostic awareness, and 4) be sensitive to the realities of fragmented healthcare. Responses also revealed training and implementation considerations. Conclusions The adapted SICG is a promising clinical tool to aid in the delivery of serious illness conversations with OAEH. Future research should use this updated guide for implementation planning. Additional adaptations may be dependent on specific settings where the SICG will be delivered.