2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75487-1_43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adapting TimeML to Basque: Event Annotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decisions on EusTimeML have been validated by means of a set of manual annotation efforts (Altuna et al 2014(Altuna et al , 2018a(Altuna et al , 2018bAltuna 2018), in which interannotator agreement has been measured. Manual annotation analysis has shown that EusTimeML annotation guidelines are unambiguous for most of the elements, but we must note that event classification has been a major source of disagreement as annotators have considered some event classes to be virtually indiscernible in some contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decisions on EusTimeML have been validated by means of a set of manual annotation efforts (Altuna et al 2014(Altuna et al , 2018a(Altuna et al , 2018bAltuna 2018), in which interannotator agreement has been measured. Manual annotation analysis has shown that EusTimeML annotation guidelines are unambiguous for most of the elements, but we must note that event classification has been a major source of disagreement as annotators have considered some event classes to be virtually indiscernible in some contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%