2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive current differential protection for active distribution network considering time synchronization error

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the protection may fail in two cases, i.e., in the section with generators at two ends with large DG capacity on the load side, and when there is a fault with large transition resistance. For these problems, differential protection schemes based on current phasor are proposed in [15][16][17], while a protection scheme only using the phase angle is proposed in [18]. However, the phase angle of fault current supplied by an IIDG is related to the voltage at the point of common coupling (PCC).…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the protection may fail in two cases, i.e., in the section with generators at two ends with large DG capacity on the load side, and when there is a fault with large transition resistance. For these problems, differential protection schemes based on current phasor are proposed in [15][16][17], while a protection scheme only using the phase angle is proposed in [18]. However, the phase angle of fault current supplied by an IIDG is related to the voltage at the point of common coupling (PCC).…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-phase short-circuit external faults are set at f 1 , f 2 , f 4 and f 5 respectively to verify the effectiveness of the proposed protection scheme. The faults occur at 0.4s, and S diff and S res are calculated according to ( 14)- (17). The simulation results are shown in Table 1 and Fig.…”
Section: External Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impedance-based differential protection requires a voltage transformer, which is costly and generates ferromagnetic resonance [26]. Differential protection based on current amplitude is proposed to avoid voltage transformers [27][28][29], but it is not suited for networks with high penetration DG access. The principles of current polarity comparison and fault current phase comparison are provided in [30,31], however, the IIDG output follows the grid voltage, lowering the sensitivity of the approach.…”
Section: Table I Advantages and Disadvantages Of Improved Differentia...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chisava et al [14] proposed a differential protection method based on the time-domain analysis of the voltage and current signals. To meet the data synchronization requirement of differential protection, some references also presented improved current differential protection methods [15][16][17] and other differential protection, such as impedance differential protection [18] and power differential protection [19]. However, these references do not address the uncertainty of PV output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%