2006
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/93.3.491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
2,202
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,648 publications
(2,220 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
12
2,202
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…dence intervals were calculated to determine pair-wise differences between genotypes while controlling for false discovery rate (FDR) (39). Distance traveled and time spent walking were significantly higher in df/+ relative to other groups, and the time spent lingering was significantly higher in df/+ relative to dp/+ mice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dence intervals were calculated to determine pair-wise differences between genotypes while controlling for false discovery rate (FDR) (39). Distance traveled and time spent walking were significantly higher in df/+ relative to other groups, and the time spent lingering was significantly higher in df/+ relative to dp/+ mice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are conservative, but are performed at the expense of power. Therefore, instead, adaptive linear step-up procedures were adopted to control the false discovery rate (the expected proportion of false positives among significant results) at 5% (Benjamini, Krieger, & Yekutieli, 2006). Since a large number of our comparisons were highly significant (14/33 p ≤ .001), linear step-up resulted in an increase in the critical value required for significance.…”
Section: Home Literacy Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apply the procedure of Benjamini and Hochberg (1995) with the α j defined in (5) replaced byα j = ĵ s 0 α * , whereŝ 0 = s − r. Benjamini et al (2006) prove that this procedure controls the FDR whenever the p-values satisfy (2) and are independent of each other. They also provide simulations which suggest that this procedure continues to control the FDR under positive dependence.…”
Section: Previous Methods For Control Of the Fdrmentioning
confidence: 99%