Adaptive localization of moving EEG sources using augmented complex tensor factorization

Fotouhi, Ardeshir; Eqlimi, Ehsan; Makkiabadi, Bahador

doi:10.1109/tsp.2017.8076023

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For the problem of localizing dynamic brain sources over time, Ardeshir et al in [135] utilized the boundary element method (BEM) [136] and the adaptive PARAFAC-RLST tracker [46] with two operational windowing schemes. A variant using augmented complex statistics in [137] also has the ability to track moving EEG sources with time.…”

Section: Neurosciencementioning

confidence: 99%

A Contemporary and Comprehensive Survey on Streaming Tensor Decomposition

Thanh¹,

abed-meraim²,

Linh-Trung³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>Tensor decomposition has been demonstrated to be successful in a wide range of applications, from neuroscience and wireless communications to social networks. In an online setting, factorizing tensors derived from multidimensional data streams is however non-trivial due to several inherent problems of real-time stream processing. In recent years, many research efforts have been dedicated to developing online techniques for decomposing such tensors, resulting in significant advances in streaming tensor decomposition or tensor tracking. This topic is emerging and enriches the literature on tensor decomposition, particularly from the data stream analystics perspective. Thus, it is imperative to carry out an overview of tensor tracking to help researchers and practitioners understand its development and achievements, summarise the current trends and advances, and identify challenging problems. In this article, we provide a contemporary and comprehensive survey on different types of tensor tracking techniques. We particularly categorize the state-of-the-art methods into three main groups: streaming CP decompositions, streaming Tucker decompositions, and streaming decompositions under other tensor formats (i.e., tensor-train, t-SVD, and BTD). In each group, we further divide the existing algorithms into sub-categories based on their main optimization framework and model architectures. Finally, we present several research challenges, open problems, and potential directions of tensor tracking in the future.</p>

show abstract

Section: Neurosciencementioning

confidence: 99%

A Contemporary and Comprehensive Survey on Streaming Tensor Decomposition

Thanh¹,

abed-meraim²,

Linh-Trung³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Contemporary and Comprehensive Survey on Streaming Tensor Decomposition

Thanh

Abed-Meraim

Trung

et al. 2023

IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tensor decomposition has been demonstrated to be successful in a wide range of applications, from neuroscience and wireless communications to social networks. In an online setting, factorizing tensors derived from multidimensional data streams is however non-trivial due to several inherent problems of real-time stream processing. In recent years, many research efforts have been dedicated to developing online techniques for decomposing such tensors, resulting in significant advances in streaming tensor decomposition or tensor tracking. This topic is emerging and enriches the literature on tensor decomposition, particularly from the data stream analystics perspective. Thus, it is imperative to carry out an overview of tensor tracking to help researchers and practitioners understand its development and achievements, summarise the current trends and advances, and identify challenging problems. In this article, we provide a contemporary and comprehensive survey on different types of tensor tracking techniques. We particularly categorize the state-of-the-art methods into three main groups: streaming CP decompositions, streaming Tucker decompositions, and streaming decompositions under other tensor formats (i.e., tensor-train, t-SVD, and BTD). In each group, we further divide the existing algorithms into sub-categories based on their main optimization framework and model architectures. Finally, we present several research challenges, open problems, and potential directions of tensor tracking in the future.

show abstract