2004 IEEE 59th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC 2004-Spring (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37514)
DOI: 10.1109/vetecs.2004.1391477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive techniques to guarantee QoS in a IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for contention-based access and HCCA mode for contention-free access respectively. There are many schemes proposed for EDCA for enhanced QoS provisioning [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66], however, HCCA is more competent in providing guaranteed QoS thanks to its contention-free nature. The HCCA reference scheme in the standard has very limited capabilities and only performs well under constant bit rate (CBR) traffic.…”
Section: Admission Control and Scheduling For Guaranteed Qos In A Scamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for contention-based access and HCCA mode for contention-free access respectively. There are many schemes proposed for EDCA for enhanced QoS provisioning [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66], however, HCCA is more competent in providing guaranteed QoS thanks to its contention-free nature. The HCCA reference scheme in the standard has very limited capabilities and only performs well under constant bit rate (CBR) traffic.…”
Section: Admission Control and Scheduling For Guaranteed Qos In A Scamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDCA is proposed as the substitute of the widely adopted DCF mode for QoS provisioning. To further improve the performance of EDCA and achieve better QoS, a number of studies have been proposed in the literature [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. Although EDCA is favored for its distributed operation, it is hard to achieve deterministic QoS because no guarantee could be really achieved when…”
Section: Qos Provisioning In Wlanmentioning
confidence: 99%