2004
DOI: 10.1002/crat.200410273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addition of an insulating element to the Modified Markov Method for CdTe single crystals growth

Abstract: CdTe single crystal, were grown by the Modified Markov Method. We have introduced an insulating element between the furnace and the growth chamber, trying to minimize the radiation effects in the crystal. Numerical simulation of the heat transfer phenomena predict a reduction of the axial temperature gradient in the growth chamber, confirming by numerical experimental measurements, leading to a more uniform growth. An improvement in the surface morphology and in the crystal quality as well was achieved, evalua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also remarkable that the temperature increase inside the growth chamber near the seed (almost 30ºC from the one without insulating element to the C insulating element), while decrease slightly neat the porous dish. These results can be compared with experimental ones [12] and consistence between them will be found.…”
Section: Alumina Insulating Elementmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also remarkable that the temperature increase inside the growth chamber near the seed (almost 30ºC from the one without insulating element to the C insulating element), while decrease slightly neat the porous dish. These results can be compared with experimental ones [12] and consistence between them will be found.…”
Section: Alumina Insulating Elementmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…3a that the calculated profile behaves on a similar way to the experimental one. The main difference is the shift on temperatures on the simulated profile that makes a bigger temperature gradient on the theoretical than in the experimental one (29.6K/cm for the numerical profile and 20.5K/cm for the experimental one) [12]. These differences, about 1% of the total temperature range, should be related with the simplifications assumed in the model, i.e.…”
Section: Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies involve microgravity [JM135], crystal interface [JM136], Bridgman growth [JM137], Czochralski growth [JM67,, FZ growth [JM143], floating crystal growth [JM144], traveling solvent method (TSM) [JM145], modified Markov method [JM146] and LEC growth [JM147]. Heat transfer in scraped eutectic crystallizers was also studied [JM148].…”
Section: Crystal Growthmentioning
confidence: 98%