2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive Manufacturing Service Provider Selection Using a Neutrosophic Best Worst Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various MCDM tools, such as BWM (Best Worst Method), AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process), ANP (Analytical Network Process), COPRAS (COmplex PRoportional Assessment), TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), FAHP (Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process) and PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations), are utilized. The decision-making process involves creating a pairwise matrix based on the decision maker's opinions, converting it into numerical values ranging from 0 to 9 (depending on the MCDM tool/technique) [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] . Subsequently, the pairwise matrix undergoes evaluation through fundamental steps like criteria weight determination, consistency ratio assessment, and random index calculation [58][59][60][61][62][63] .…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision-making (Mcdm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various MCDM tools, such as BWM (Best Worst Method), AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process), ANP (Analytical Network Process), COPRAS (COmplex PRoportional Assessment), TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), FAHP (Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process) and PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations), are utilized. The decision-making process involves creating a pairwise matrix based on the decision maker's opinions, converting it into numerical values ranging from 0 to 9 (depending on the MCDM tool/technique) [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] . Subsequently, the pairwise matrix undergoes evaluation through fundamental steps like criteria weight determination, consistency ratio assessment, and random index calculation [58][59][60][61][62][63] .…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision-making (Mcdm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raja et al [4] applied the MCDM strategy to choose the appropriate additive manufacturing machine from the 3D printer client's perspective, utilizing the Fuzzy TOPSIS technique. The neutrosophic best-worst MCDM technique was utilized by Ghuge et al [35] to pick the provider of additive manufacturing services. The hybrid MCDM technique was used by Chandra et al to choose the sustainable additive manufacturing concept for solving environmental challenges [36].…”
Section: Mathematical Programming Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%