Addressing endogeneity in the causal relationship between sustainability and financial performance

Abstract

The empirical literature considers firm specific aspects affecting corporate sustainability decisions but generally omits the influence of the competition. We advocate that sustainability actions of a company impact its marketplace and vice versa. Therefore, the sustainability return of the single firm is a function of the other firms' sustainability decisions. We approach sustainability decisions as strategic decisions and evaluate the effect of competition and spillovers in a static market entry game. We estimate the parameters of the discrete choice model using the social performance ratings from MSCI KLD 400 Social Index as proxy for sustainability decisions and financial information from Wharton Research Data Services' COMPUSTAT dataset. When strategic interaction is not accounted for, we find that the increasing number of competitors increases the likelihood of sustainability investments, seemingly shows the spillover effect dominates the competition. When we apply the multistage approach, which incorporates competitive interaction, we provide empirical evidence that the effect of competition on the likelihood of entry into the sustainability market dominates the effect of spillover. We find that strategic motives, typically ignored in the empirical literature, appear to be an important factor in understanding sustainability related decisions.

Sustainable Business Practices and Firm’s Financial Performance in Islamic Banking: Under the Moderating Role of Islamic Corporate Governance

“…This study, by dealing with the problem of endogeneity, set an instrumental viable. Consistent with the past study of Reference [20], a dummy code of (1) was given to those banks which had their total sustainability scores above the then median of the sample, while a dummy code of (0) was given to those banks which had their total sustainability scores below the then sustainability median of the sample. To test whether the set instrument was efficient or not, this study ran the first-stage regression summary statistics for instrumental variable through STATA, and the results confirmed the instrument used in this study was strong.…”

Addressing endogeneity by proposing novel instrumental variables in the nexus of sustainability reporting and firm financial performance: A step‐by‐step procedure for non‐experts

“…Accordingly, the prior empirical literature also produced different results for the relationship of CSD with both accounting and market-based FFP (Jiao, 2010). However, most of these studies overlooked the potential problem of endogeneity in the relationship (Soytas et al, 2019). Endogeneity, which is an output of any of the omitted variables, measurement error, common-method variance, and reverse causality, could be one of the possible reasons for the inconclusive and inconsistent findings of the relationship (Gretz & Malshe, 2019;Ullah et al, 2020;Wooldridge, 2013).…”

Sustainability Management and Performance in the Urban Corporate Economy: A Systematic Literature Review

“…Operational and economic features [22][23][24][25] should be integrated into the objective of attaining superior corporate sustainability performance. Performance evaluation systems and their associated indicators need an adequate capability to undertake sustainability mainstays and their connections, in addition to scalability to organizations of various sizes, the convenience of internal resources, and soundness, regarding sustainability matters.…”