Addressing the Apparent Controversies Between the Contact Angle-Based Models for Estimation of Surface Free Energy: A Critical Review

Abstract

The most popular contact angle (CA)-based approaches for determination of solid surface free energy (SFE) are considered: (i) single liquid methods, mainly of Neumann and Chibowski, (ii) the multiple liquids approach of Owens–Wendt–Rabel–Kaelble (OWRK), and (iii) van Oss-Chaudhury–Good (vOCG) acid–base model. Evaluations based on Neumann and Chibowski models agree between each other. Under the assumption of equilibrium “wet wetting” (i.e., presence of saturated precursor film ahead of the drop), the model of Chibowski transforms in Lipatov’s interfacial equilibrium rule, i.e., the Antonow rule derived for the ternary point solid–liquid–gas. Very good agreement is observed between single and multiple liquids models where OWRK/vOCG values can be viewed as a mean of the individual SFE adopted by the solid with each of the wetting probes. Both approaches (single and multiple liquids) can be used in conjunction to evaluate SFE dispersion and polar components and to elucidate hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity. The implementation of apparently fully non-polar liquids (diiodomethane, bromonaphthalene) in OWRK and vOCG is practically and theoretically suspect. CA-based estimates represent apparent SFE determined by the interactions of both the solid surface and the probing liquid, which are very useful to elucidate the energy, chemistry and dynamics of the solid surface.