Adequate margin definition for scanned particle therapy in the incidence of intrafractional motion

Abstract

Advanced 4D dose calculations (4DDCs) for scanned particle therapy show that in the incidence of motion, it is insufficient to use target contours defined on one reference CT phase. ICRU Report 62 (ICRU 1999 ICRU Report 62 (Bethesda, MD: ICRU)) advises that variations in size, shape and position of CTVs relative to anatomic reference points have to be considered for internal target volumes (ITVs). In addition to geometrical margin adaption, changes of water equivalent path length have to be considered for particle therapy. Different ITV concepts have been applied to six representative patients (liver and lung indications) based on 4DCT. Geometrical ITVs (gITV) were calculated by combining deformed CTVs over all motion phases. To take into account path length changes, range adapted ITVs (raITV) were established as the union of range adapted CTVs in all phases. For gated delivery, gat_gITVs and gat_raITVs were calculated. Extensive 4DDCs have been performed for two exemplary patients to illustrate that neither re-scanning nor gating can sufficiently compensate for motion effects if no appropriate margins are employed and to evaluate the effectiveness of gITVs and raITVs. CTVs significantly differ from gITVs and raITVs in size (up to a factor 2 in volume). But also raITVs and gITVs differ significantly in size and are spatially displaced, particularly for lung patients. raITVs show a strong field dependence in shape. All volumes are reduced in size when gating is applied and considered during margin adaption. 4D dose distributions show big improvements when gITV or raITV are used compared to CTVs. However, the use of either gITVs or raITVs do not result in significant differences. If raITVs are used, slightly better target coverage is gained at the cost of more healthy tissue exposure. Our results emphasize that adapted target volumes have to be used for scanned particle therapy in the presence of motion. However, even though gITVs and raITVs differ significantly in shape and size, this difference does not necessarily translate into significant differences in the resultant 4D dose distributions.

Beam‐specific planning target volumes incorporating 4D CT for pencil beam scanning proton therapy of thoracic tumors

“…The method we used to evaluate beam interplay is similar to Zou et al (33) for conventional lung SBRT applications and other researchers for PBS applications 11 , 12 , 18 , 19 , 21 . A representative patient is shown in Fig.…”

“…As reported by previous researchers, 11 , 12 we calculated the change of water‐equivalence path length (WEPL) associated with organ motion and converted such WETM to GTM based on local tissue densities. In contrast to the conceptual demonstration by Graeff et al (11) for MFO application, we focus on SFO application in multiple thoracic patients.…”

Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer

“…Therefore, it is also essential to minimize this effect to take full advantage of IMPT to treat lung cancer. Many approaches have been proposed to mitigate this effect, including range-adapted internal target volume (ITV) (27–29), breath hold, gating, tumor tracking, and 4D treatment planning. Previous studies (15,19,21,22,24,25) on interplay effect in IMPT were limited by the use of IMPT plans derived by 3D planning without robust optimization.…”

A fast Monte Carlo code for proton transport in radiation therapy based on MCNPX

“…These characteristics incorporate the basic role of radiation therapy which is to concentrate a high dose onto the target volume while minimizing any unnecessary radiation dose to the surrounding normal tissues. [23456]…”