1975
DOI: 10.1112/blms/7.3.294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjoint Lifting Theorems for Categories of Algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a standard result that in presence of a distributive law like n: (-)* o M ^ M o (-)* the composite M o (-)* is again a monad, see for instance [6,19,4]. Moreover, the multiset monad M can be lifted to a monad M on the category of (-) * -algebra (monoids), such that the algebras of the composite monad M o (-)* are the same as M-algebras.…”
Section: The Semiring Monadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a standard result that in presence of a distributive law like n: (-)* o M ^ M o (-)* the composite M o (-)* is again a monad, see for instance [6,19,4]. Moreover, the multiset monad M can be lifted to a monad M on the category of (-) * -algebra (monoids), such that the algebras of the composite monad M o (-)* are the same as M-algebras.…”
Section: The Semiring Monadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof It is a standard result due to Johnstone [11] that a mixed distributive law AC → C A determines a functor C :…”
Section: Be a Morphism Of Monads On K Assume That A And T Preserve Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following "folklore" result gives an alternative description of distributive laws in terms of liftings to Kleisli and Eilenberg-Moore categories, see also [16] or [1]. Proposition 1 ("laws and liftings").…”
Section: Liftings To Kleisli and Eilenberg-moore Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%