2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-020-0651-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of copper ions from aqueous media using montmorillonite-Al2O3 nano-adsorbent incorporated with Fe3O4 for facile separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the Al 2 O 3 impregnation, the particle size was shifted to the 10–76.2 nm range with a 26.3 nm mean, and ∼90% of particles showed <44.3 nm size. As can be seen, the incorporation of Al 2 O 3 particles to the MMT surface led to an increase in the overall particle size, which exhibits good compatibility with a previous study …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After the Al 2 O 3 impregnation, the particle size was shifted to the 10–76.2 nm range with a 26.3 nm mean, and ∼90% of particles showed <44.3 nm size. As can be seen, the incorporation of Al 2 O 3 particles to the MMT surface led to an increase in the overall particle size, which exhibits good compatibility with a previous study …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Cation exchange was achieved through the dispersion of 50 g/L MMT suspension in 400 mL NaCl (1 mol/L) followed by 3 h stirring at 500 rpm at 70 °C. Then, the suspension was washed with deionized water and centrifuged several times. Na-MMT was prepared by the dispersion of 10 g/L Na-MMT suspension by an ultrasonic dispersion instrument with 450 W power for 5 min …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The model terms affecting BC production were found to be X 1 , X 1 2 , and X 2 2 ; temperature ( X 1 ) was the most significant variable among the three independent variables examined. The statistical acceptability of the predictive model was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), and a value close to 1 indicates that the experimental response agrees with the predicted response within the designed experimental range [ 30 ]. The R 2 values higher than 0.8 and a difference between R 2 and adjusted R 2 not exceeding 0.2 indicate the reliability of the model [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%