1986
DOI: 10.1080/00380768.1986.10557535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of Heavy Metal Cations on Hydrated Oxides and Oxides of Iron and Aluminum with Different Crystallinities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
7

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
16
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The "Rhodic" Acrudox presented higher Fe t , Fe d , Al t and Al d concentrations when compared to the two other soils, and higher and similar amorphous Fe-oxide concentration when compared to "Xanthic" Acrudox and Rhodic Hapludalf, respectively (Table 2). Although the hydrated Fe oxides and hydroxides, that appear amorphous under X-ray diffraction, present higher adsorption capacity (Okazaki et al, 1986) and also higher amount of positive charges (Yu, 1997) than the crystalline ones, they are not responsible for the higher Ni adsorption capacity of "Rhodic" Acrudox, despite the fact that this latter soil presents higher Fe o concentration. On the other hand, the "Xanthic" Acrudox and Rhodic Hapludalf presented higher quantity of kaolinite than "Rhodic" Acrudox, which might have compensated lower Ni ad- Table 3 -Nickel adsorbed by soil samples from the 0-0.2 m layer depth, before and after the organic matter removal (OMfree soil) and organic matter + Fe-oxide removal (OM + FeOx-free soil).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The "Rhodic" Acrudox presented higher Fe t , Fe d , Al t and Al d concentrations when compared to the two other soils, and higher and similar amorphous Fe-oxide concentration when compared to "Xanthic" Acrudox and Rhodic Hapludalf, respectively (Table 2). Although the hydrated Fe oxides and hydroxides, that appear amorphous under X-ray diffraction, present higher adsorption capacity (Okazaki et al, 1986) and also higher amount of positive charges (Yu, 1997) than the crystalline ones, they are not responsible for the higher Ni adsorption capacity of "Rhodic" Acrudox, despite the fact that this latter soil presents higher Fe o concentration. On the other hand, the "Xanthic" Acrudox and Rhodic Hapludalf presented higher quantity of kaolinite than "Rhodic" Acrudox, which might have compensated lower Ni ad- Table 3 -Nickel adsorbed by soil samples from the 0-0.2 m layer depth, before and after the organic matter removal (OMfree soil) and organic matter + Fe-oxide removal (OM + FeOx-free soil).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Segundo Okazaki et al (1986), a retenção de íons metálicos por superfícies de óxidos é inversamente dependente do grau de cristalinidade e, por causa das cargas variáveis dos óxidos, dependente do pH.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Compared with cadmium, water-soluble copper is 0.8-9.2% of total copper in soil, and it does not dissolve easily in water. This is due to the fact that, compared to cadmium, a greater proportion of copper is in a form contained within crystal structures 17 . In soil G, the amount of water-soluble cadmium and copper extracted with water from soil sampled was lower in deeper soil layers (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%