Advances in Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-78242-121-4.00002-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in ceramic membranes for water treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of the PEGs, PEG n=1 to PEG n=5 , was selected based on the purchased cut-off of the membranes (Eqs. (2) and (3), Table 2). It's imperative to keep the PEG range as small as possible to prevent pore plugging by large PEG molecules.…”
Section: Mwco Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The range of the PEGs, PEG n=1 to PEG n=5 , was selected based on the purchased cut-off of the membranes (Eqs. (2) and (3), Table 2). It's imperative to keep the PEG range as small as possible to prevent pore plugging by large PEG molecules.…”
Section: Mwco Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of long-term chemical cleaning with sodium hypochlorite on the tubular ceramic NF membranes was investigated because it is known as the most effective cleaning agent for (organically) fouled ceramic membranes [2,6,17,21]. The permeability and MWCO were tested after 100 h of chemical cleaning with 1% sodium hypochlorite to simulate the cleaning intensity of one year of operation, assuming five days of continuous filtration followed by 1.33 h of chemical cleaning with 1% sodium hypochlorite for 365 days [17].…”
Section: Chemical Cleaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations