2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing bioplastic packaging products through co-innovation: A conceptual framework for supplier-customer collaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SLR is a more authentic and verifiable source that incorporates a more comprehensive and unbiased search. According to [29] , SLR ”provides a precise mechanism and a stringent review protocol performed to minimize researchers’ bias and maintain the independence of the research process, yet allowing exploration and discovery that contributes to developing an understanding.” The fundamental difference between a traditional narrative review and a Systematic literature review exists is comprehensive and unbiased search [54] . Extensive literature survey ushers that articles based on Systematic literature review can be in different forms such as structured review articles with discussion on methods theories discussed constructs that the previous researchers and contexts used and conditions of the study (Rosado-Serrano, Paul, & Dikova, 2018; Canabal & White, 2008, Paul & Singh, 2017; Kahiya, 2018; Hao et al, 2019); Conceptual framework based papers with further research directions (Paul, Parthasarathy & Gupta, 2017; Kumar, Paul & Unnithan, 2019), theoretical review paper (Gilal et al, 2018; Paul & Rosad-Serrano, 2019), meta-analysis (Knoll & Matthes, 2017), bibliometric review (Randhawa et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodology Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…SLR is a more authentic and verifiable source that incorporates a more comprehensive and unbiased search. According to [29] , SLR ”provides a precise mechanism and a stringent review protocol performed to minimize researchers’ bias and maintain the independence of the research process, yet allowing exploration and discovery that contributes to developing an understanding.” The fundamental difference between a traditional narrative review and a Systematic literature review exists is comprehensive and unbiased search [54] . Extensive literature survey ushers that articles based on Systematic literature review can be in different forms such as structured review articles with discussion on methods theories discussed constructs that the previous researchers and contexts used and conditions of the study (Rosado-Serrano, Paul, & Dikova, 2018; Canabal & White, 2008, Paul & Singh, 2017; Kahiya, 2018; Hao et al, 2019); Conceptual framework based papers with further research directions (Paul, Parthasarathy & Gupta, 2017; Kumar, Paul & Unnithan, 2019), theoretical review paper (Gilal et al, 2018; Paul & Rosad-Serrano, 2019), meta-analysis (Knoll & Matthes, 2017), bibliometric review (Randhawa et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodology Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data collection protocol used in this study includes a rigorous search strategy with some specific criteria for inclusion and exclusion of the articles to fulfill a Systematic literature review objective. The search strategy incorporates appropriate steps such as identifying and selecting relevant keywords and search terms, selecting the database for articles, further modification of keywords, and applying search strategy [ 29 , 54 ].…”
Section: Methodology Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As practice shows, the perception of fairness promotes the involvement of supply chain participants in the development and implementation of green innovations, and the involvement creates favorable conditions for the exchange of experience and knowledge [17]. In the context of cooperation in the development and practical implementation of measures in the field of environmental preservation, the concept of co-innovation has been introduced, reflecting the mechanism of interaction between the developer of an innovation and its consumer-the manufacturer of a particular product [18]. Living laboratories and Do-It-Yourself laboratories are becoming elements of global innovation systems, acting as a kind of knowledge broker.…”
Section: Theoretical Review 21 Theoretical and Methodological Approaches To The Study Of Strategic Innovation As A Factor Of Adaptation Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extant contributions in this domain cover a varied but fragmented range of topics that have studied how the transition of the bioeconomy may evolve concerning the different sectors involved in a sustainable transition. Examples can be found in forest-based bioeconomy [9,10], bioplastics and biolubricants for the road and aviation sectors [11], value networks that can facilitate the diffusion of sustainable innovation in food packaging [12], the adaptation of business models for a biocircular economy [13][14][15] and co-innovation mechanisms [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%