2013
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/429/1/012018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol size distribution estimation and associated uncertainty for measurement with a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NF characterization station included a second PM 4 PPI and a 10 l buffer bottle to which a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS: Grimm Ainring, Germany, models 55-40-25 DMA and 5.403 CPC) and a second DiscMini particle counter were connected. The SMPS measures particles in a size range from 10 to 1110nm in 31 different size channels and in concentrations up to 10 7 particles cm −3 , and has been widely used as the standard for measuring airborne particle size distributions due to its ability to conduct differential mobility analysis of various particles ( Wang and Flagan, 1990 ; Coquelin et al , 2013 ; further information about SMPS sizing methods is included in Supplementary Material, note S1 ). The SMPS was set to fast scan mode with measurement cycles of 3.5min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NF characterization station included a second PM 4 PPI and a 10 l buffer bottle to which a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS: Grimm Ainring, Germany, models 55-40-25 DMA and 5.403 CPC) and a second DiscMini particle counter were connected. The SMPS measures particles in a size range from 10 to 1110nm in 31 different size channels and in concentrations up to 10 7 particles cm −3 , and has been widely used as the standard for measuring airborne particle size distributions due to its ability to conduct differential mobility analysis of various particles ( Wang and Flagan, 1990 ; Coquelin et al , 2013 ; further information about SMPS sizing methods is included in Supplementary Material, note S1 ). The SMPS was set to fast scan mode with measurement cycles of 3.5min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among others, Bond et al (2013) discussed specific issues related to BC and OC aerosols, while for PM size distribution there exists specific analysis for particular measurement equipment (e.g. Armas et al, 2007;Coquelin et al, 2013) and most of the studies reporting measurements of size distribution estimate uncertainties for each size category. While the sum of all the PM species is constrained by the total mass, the single size distribution values rely on a large number of measurements, reducing the overall uncertainty.…”
Section: Uncertainty In Emission Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aerosol mobility distributions were measured in both positive and negative polarities with a DMA and a condensation particle counter (CPC) for both the post-DBD neutralizer and a radioactive ( 85 Kr of 74 MBq) neutralizer. The TSI SMPS software (Aerosol Instrument Manager, Version 8.0; TSI Inc., Shoreview, MN, USA) was used to calculate particle size distribution from the mobility distributions measured with the DMA-CPC system, relative SMPS measurement uncertainties are treated in Coquelin et al (2013).…”
Section: Aerosol Production and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%