Affective Leadership Practices: A Framework for Studying Affect and Leadership from a Schatzkian Practice Approach

Abstract

<b>In this study, I develop a new research avenue through which the leadership phenomenon can be better understood. I do so by developing a novel framework for studying leadership and affect from a Schatzkian practice approach. </b><p>I developed this framework through a dialogue between theory and my empirical study. The empirical part of my research consisted of a seven-month ethnographic study in one nonprofit service organisation in Israel. I built the theoretical part of this framework by integrating and further synthesising the literatures on affective practices (Wetherell, 2012) and leadership-as-practice (Carroll, Levy, & Richmond, 2008; Raelin, 2016c) based on the practice theory of Theodore Schatzki (1996, 2002). I have called this integrated conceptual framework affective leadership practices. </p> <b>The methodological part of my framework was developed through an experimental process, in which I used different methods and occupied different organisational positions. I found that the method of “apprenticeship”, which entails the active participation of the researcher as a practitioner in the practice that is being studied (Wacquant, 2004, 2005, 2015), was very appropriate to use as the primary research method. This method allows the researcher to generate valuable embodied understanding of the practice that is being studied, while gaining great sensitivity to power relations. </b><p>This theory-method package (Nicolini, 2017) that I have developed has served me as a heuristic device, a synthesising framework for empirical research. It offered me a certain way to see and analyse leadership and affect (Reckwitz, 2002). Through my data analysis, I illustrate the type of understandings that this framework makes possible to generate. I illuminate the type of normative realities that prevail in the organisation that I studied, and offer nuanced understandings of the ways in which leadership and affect are involved in the construction and reconstruction of these realities. I illustrate how this takes place in reciprocal processes of affective influence that involve multiple human and non-human participants, through which organisational realities are constantly being reproduced, modified, and even resisted. My analysis also illuminates the embeddedness of leadership and the organisation where it manifests in the wider local context. This allows us to comprehend why the organisational realities that I investigated turned out to be in the way they are, who is empowered in these realities, and what effects these realities generate in their local context. </p> <p>The research tools that I have developed in this study and this type of analysis that can be generated with them offer researchers critical, holistic, and situated understandings of leadership and the organisations it transpires from. It places the affective human body and its relations with other human and non-human participants in leadership at centre stage. </p>

The Business Paradox: Exploring the interaction between the Business Clock and the Sustainable Development Goals through an ethical, sustainable and well-being prism

“…Además, se respalda en el liderazgo auténtico, el liderazgo de servicio (47) y el liderazgo transformacional, (47,48,49) que ha ido creciendo como concepto práctico y esencial para el desarrollo. (49,50) También se destaca el liderazgo afectivo, (51) que se combina con el cumplimiento responsable. Otros enfoques relevantes son el liderazgo inspiracional (52,53) y el liderazgo de iluminación interior, que fomenta la toma de decisiones saludables y productivas sin perjudicar a los demás.…”

A Focus on Ethical Value under the Vision of Leadership, Teamwork, Effective Communication and Productivity

“…Now, ethical leadership integrates a series of emerging types of leadership, with different names, but with ethical roots as their essence and with mutual affinity. These are authentic leadership (Semedo et al 2019); spiritual or virtuous leadership (Pio and Tampi 2018;Smith et al 2018); shared leadership (Choi et al 2017;Zhu et al 2018); affective or care leadership (Maggeni 2021); integrative leader-ship (Zhang et al 2018); inspirational leadership (Salas-Vallina et al 2020;Murnieks et al 2016); charismatic leadership (Graboa et al 2017;Jamal and Bakar 2017). All of the above leadership types are of a positive tendency and are linked directly or indirectly to the dimensions under study.…”