1996
DOI: 10.1021/jm960345l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affinity for Dopamine D2, D3, and D4Receptors of 2-Aminotetralins. Relevance of D2Agonist Binding for Determination of Receptor Subtype Selectivity

Abstract: A series of 2-aminotetralins, substituted with a methoxy or a hydroxy group on the 5- or 7-position, and with varying N-alkyl or N-arylalkyl substituents, were prepared and evaluated in binding assays for human dopamine (DA) D2, D3, and D4 receptors. Some members of this series were prepared in former studies, but were never tested in vitro with single receptor subtypes, and these were examined again. None of the tested 2-aminotetralins showed high affinity for the dopamine D4 receptor. However, a number of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the electron attractive groups decrease the binding affinity, while electron donors like -OCH 3 increase the affinity for the binding at the dopamine D 2 receptor in comparison with the unsubstituted analogues [43,44]. Also, methoxy group is said to be linked with binding affinity of the drug molecules at dopamine D 2 and D 3 receptor sites [43].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the electron attractive groups decrease the binding affinity, while electron donors like -OCH 3 increase the affinity for the binding at the dopamine D 2 receptor in comparison with the unsubstituted analogues [43,44]. Also, methoxy group is said to be linked with binding affinity of the drug molecules at dopamine D 2 and D 3 receptor sites [43].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In illustration of the SBP hypothesized butyl linker for dopamine D 3 receptor specificity is implemented. represented for rigid 5-OH-DPAT and 7-OH-DPAT, respectively (Van Vliet et al, 1996). Comparing binding affinities (Table 1) at different D 2 -like receptor subtypes, dopamine showed higher affinity at human D 3 over D 2 (K i hD 2 /K i hD 3 = 2-43), but highest affinity at D 4 .…”
Section: Receptor Agonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aminotetralines can also be taken as core structure for other aminergic receptors as they have the 2-(hetero)arylethanamine moiety in common (Dijkstra et al, 2002). For dopaminergic receptors an aromatic hydroxy function in 5-or 7-position enhances affinity as well as selectivity, while methoxy groups at this position as hydrogen acceptors cannot maintain affinity (Elsner et al, 2005;Van Vliet et al, 1996). Concerning the substitution pattern on the basic amine, n-propyl moieties are affinity increasing, whereas in disubstituted analogues larger variations with potential binding properties to the secondary binding pocket (SBP) are tolerated (Cannon, 1983;Dijkstra et al, 2002;Seiler et al, 1986;Van Vliet et al, 1996).…”
Section: Receptor Agonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To confirm that the allosteric effect across the receptor-receptor interface is exerted by specific agonist binding, further control experiments were performed. In earlier studies, we described two mutations in the extracellular loop of NTS 1 (W129A and W134A), which show a complete loss in agonist binding of [ 3 H]NT (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) , but which exhibit retention of antagonist binding of [ 3 H]SR4869. [8] We produced transiently co-expressing cell lines of D 3 and NTS 1 W129A or NTS 1 W134A.…”
Section: Mixture Of Singlymentioning
confidence: 99%