2012
DOI: 10.1177/0021909612439741
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afro-Continentalism: Pan-Africanism in Post-Settlement South Africa’s Foreign Policy

Abstract: In his book In

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the second propos-al was led by Nigeria and South Africa, countries that defended the conservation of the sovereign states, and understood that the OAU should be a protagonist in inter-African relations. However, while Abuja defended the characteristic points of the Kampala Movement, Pretoria emphasised that the organisation should not only create norms, principles, and a new structure, but also regulate the conduct of the member states in order for them to respect and accept the resolutions adopted under the organisation's scope (Landsberg 2012).…”
Section: The African Renaissance the African Union And Nepadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the second propos-al was led by Nigeria and South Africa, countries that defended the conservation of the sovereign states, and understood that the OAU should be a protagonist in inter-African relations. However, while Abuja defended the characteristic points of the Kampala Movement, Pretoria emphasised that the organisation should not only create norms, principles, and a new structure, but also regulate the conduct of the member states in order for them to respect and accept the resolutions adopted under the organisation's scope (Landsberg 2012).…”
Section: The African Renaissance the African Union And Nepadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ao longo dessa transição, duas vertentes passaram a ser predominantes, sendo a primeira simbolizada pelo desejo da Líbia em criar os Estados Unidos 11-25 da África, isto é, mover o continente para a formação de um Estado Federalista. Já a segunda, englobava os interesses da Nigéria, país que defendia maior participação da organização em temas relacionados à segurança, e da África do Sul, cuja percepção era de que a nova organização deveria ser marcada tanto pela criação de regras e normas quanto também e, fundamentalmente, pelo comprometimento dos países-membros em acatar tais criações (Landsberg 2012a). Grosso modo, a segunda vertente foi predominante, uma vez que pontos como segurança humana, valorização e construção de princípios, de instituições, de estruturas políticas e de mecanismos que pudessem regular o comportamento dos Estados passaram a fazer parte da UA (CAAU 2000).…”
Section: -25unclassified
“…The essence of Maserumule's argument in his article, therefore, is that a core challenge, amongst several others that South Africans must brace themselves up for, is the task of transforming their democratic state into a 'developmental state', which would deliver the economic dividends of multi-racial democracy to all South Africans. Chris Landsberg's (2012) contribution is based on an assertion made by Kondlo in his In The Twilight of the Revolution that aspects of the foreign policy agenda on Africa that successive ANCled governments in South Africa have pursued derived from the PAC's Pan-Africanist ideals. But the pertinent query, which Landsberg ought to have raised and probably addressed in the discourse that he weaved in his article is: are there some foundational maladies that have practically inhibited Africa's contemporary states from performing up to the expectations of their respective populace in every aspect of their lives ever since the end of de facto colonial rule all over the continent?…”
Section: The Pac and Others Must Make Themselves Relevant Againmentioning
confidence: 99%