2020
DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age differences in Machiavellianism across the life span: Evidence from a large‐scale cross‐sectional study

Abstract: Objective Lifespan perspectives on personality development have gained much momentum in recent years, mostly focusing on benevolent and neutral traits such as the Big Five. Despite their strong associations with critical personal outcomes, surprisingly little research has investigated the development of malevolent traits. Addressing this gap, we examined age trends in Machiavellianism across the lifespan. Methods Using data from a large‐scale cross‐sectional sample (n = 1,118,643), we analyzed mean‐level chang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(223 reference statements)
2
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Following previous geopsychological studies (e.g., Gebauer et al, 2017), we only kept spatial units with at least 100 observations. As is typical for online studies (Gosling, Vazire, Srivastava, & John, 2004), our sample overrepresented female (75.5%) and young (MAge = 31.02, SD =10.29) participants. We therefore followed previous research (Ebert et al, 2019;Steutzer et al, 2018) and applied poststratification to account for this skewed sample composition.…”
Section: Methods and Materials Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following previous geopsychological studies (e.g., Gebauer et al, 2017), we only kept spatial units with at least 100 observations. As is typical for online studies (Gosling, Vazire, Srivastava, & John, 2004), our sample overrepresented female (75.5%) and young (MAge = 31.02, SD =10.29) participants. We therefore followed previous research (Ebert et al, 2019;Steutzer et al, 2018) and applied poststratification to account for this skewed sample composition.…”
Section: Methods and Materials Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The data were collected between June 2017 and October 2018 as part of a collaborative project between the authors and TIME Magazine (see Ebert, Götz, Obschonka, Zmigrod, & Rentfrow, 2019;Götz, Bleidorn, & Rentfrow, 2020), with the approval of the Psychology Research Ethics…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rest (N = 51,933) were residents of 46 other nations. The data were collected between June 2017 and October 2018 as part of a collaborative project between the authors and TIME Magazine (see Ebert, Götz, Obschonka, Zmigrod, & Rentfrow, 2019;Götz, Bleidorn, & Rentfrow, 2020), with the approval of the Psychology Research Ethics Committee of the institution (in cluding a waiver of parental consent; application number: PRE.2017.044). The study was carried out as an online survey hosted, launched, and advertised by TIME Magazine (https://time.com/4809884/harry-potter-house-sorting-hat-quiz/) and included two parts, only available in English.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatedly, our study relied on an online convenience sample. Like other large-scale online convenience samples, the sociodemographic composition of our data was skewed towards females and younger people (Gosling et al, 2004;Götz, Bleidorn, et al, 2020;Rentfrow et al, 2015). As we controlled for the sample composition in our analyses, we can rule out the possibility that these skewed demographics drove our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…After applying these selection criteria, the sample included 1,946,752 participants. As is typical for online convenience samples (Gosling et al, 2004;Götz, Bleidorn, & Rentfrow, 2020;Jokela et al, 2015), the demographic composition of this sample was skewed towards females (65.01%) and younger people (MAge = 27.33, SDAge = 11.90).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%