2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age estimation in Indians from pulp/tooth area ratio of mandibular canines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
73
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
73
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a lower mean error in age estimates (7.99 to 8.56 years) using this formula than those determined using the original formula. This finding is similar to another study 4 that used a specific formula for an Indian population. On the other hand, another study 22 showed that it is possible to use the same formula for age estimates in both Italian and Portuguese populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We observed a lower mean error in age estimates (7.99 to 8.56 years) using this formula than those determined using the original formula. This finding is similar to another study 4 that used a specific formula for an Indian population. On the other hand, another study 22 showed that it is possible to use the same formula for age estimates in both Italian and Portuguese populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Several studies have used orthopantomographs, 14,18,19 but we used periapical radiographs in this study because they produced more reliable data with lower chances of superimposition. 4,18,20,21,22,23,24 One of the difficulties we encountered was achieving the desired sample size because all radiographs did not show 4 healthy canines. This issue was more common in patients aged 60 years and older.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the 20 articles, 13 studies [5][6][7][8][9][12][13][14][15][16][17]22,23) were performed on orthopantomograms for measuring of the size of the pulp cavity and 7 studies 4,10,11,[18][19][20][21] were performed on periapical radiographs. Although most studies included range of age, only one study 23) provided insufficient data of age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%