2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age estimation in Portuguese population: The application of the London atlas of tooth development and eruption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
23
2
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
23
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that the estimates obtained on both sides are biased, i.e., a systematic error was made (Right: author p=0.000; Pavlović p=0.104; Left: author p=0.000; Pavlović p=0.052). Thus, these results are not consistent with Pavlović et al (26), knowing that the main difference between these studies was the population at hand, i.e. patients with syndromes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It seems that the estimates obtained on both sides are biased, i.e., a systematic error was made (Right: author p=0.000; Pavlović p=0.104; Left: author p=0.000; Pavlović p=0.052). Thus, these results are not consistent with Pavlović et al (26), knowing that the main difference between these studies was the population at hand, i.e. patients with syndromes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…The obtained intraobserver ICC values are slightly higher than in AlQahtani (0.879) (23) and Cesário et al (0.925) (16) but lower than in Pavlović et al (26) (0.998 and 0.997 for RS and LS, correspondingly). As for Pinchi et al (6) they reported a 93% agreement.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations