Age, Height, and Sex on Motor Evoked Potentials: Translational Data From a Large Italian Cohort in a Clinical Environment

Abstract

Introduction Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are known to be susceptible to several sources of variability. However, conflicting evidences on individual characteristics in relatively small sample sizes have been reported. We investigated the effect of age, height, and sex on MEPs of the motor cortex and spinal roots in a large cohort. Methods A total of 587 subjects clinically and neuroradiologically intact were included. MEPs were recorded during mild tonic contraction through a circular coil applied over the “hot spot” of the first dorsal interosseous and tibialis anterior muscles (TAs), bilaterally. Central motor conduction time (CMCT) was estimated as the difference between MEP cortical latency and the peripheral motor conduction time (PMCT) by cervical or lumbar magnetic stimulation. Peak-to-peak MEP amplitude to cortical stimulation and right-to-left difference of each parameter were also measured. Results After Bonferroni correction, general linear (multiple) regression analysis showed that both MEP cortical latency and PMCT at four limbs positively correlated with age and height. At lower limbs, an independent effect of sex on the same measures was also observed (with females showing smaller values than males). CMCT correlated with both age (negatively) and height (positively) when analyzed by a single regression; however, with a multiple regression analysis this significance disappeared, due to the correction for the multicollinearity within the dataset. Conclusion Physical individual features need to be considered for a more accurate and meaningful MEPs interpretation. Both in clinical practice and in research setting, patients and controls should be matched for age, height, and sex.

Corticospinal tract damage in HHH syndrome: a metabolic cause of hereditary spastic paraplegia

“…CMCT values were considered abnormal if > 20 ms or with a side-to-side difference > 2 ms [18]. Normative CMCT values were obtained from literature data for adult patients [19] and from studies performed at our hospital on healthy age-matched subjects for pediatric ones. SSEPs were measured at the posterior tibial muscle by the central sensory conduction time (CSCT).…”

SARS-CoV-2 and the Nervous System: From Clinical Features to Molecular Mechanisms

“…However, in the current epidemic, some difficulties may occur in performing MRI or a lumbar puncture, especially in severely affected patients and in those admitted in intensive care units. Nevertheless, it remains of pivotal importance for all patients with altered consciousness or any unexplained neurological manifestation to receive an accurate neurological exam and appropriate instrumental investigations (i.e., neuroimaging, EEG, evoked potentials, CSF), when necessary [134].…”

Update on the Neurobiology of Vascular Cognitive Impairment: From Lab to Clinic

“…Among neurophysiological techniques, TMS is a non-invasive tool evaluating cortical excitability, synaptic plasticity, and functional connectivity in vivo and in "real time", in physiological conditions [70][71][72] and in a number of psychiatric and neurological disorders [73][74][75][76][77][78], including cognitive impairment and dementia [42,49,79], also providing neurochemical insights [80][81][82][83].…”