2014
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related patterns of antler development in free-ranging white-tailed deer

Abstract: The relationship of antler size at one age to that at a later age is important in cervid management, in part by defining the effects of selective harvest based on antler characteristics. We used capture and harvest records from 2,948 male white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) on 5 study sites over a 10-year period to define age-antler size relationships. Antler size (Boone and Crockett score converted to cm) increased with deer age to 5 years of age, and we therefore considered males mature at !5 years of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimated conception dates were derived from foetal measurements (Hamilton, Tobin, & Moore, 1985). Tissue samples and age of potential sires were collected from males captured or harvested during 1999(DeYoung et al, 2009Foley et al, 2015;Hewitt, Hellickson, Lewis, Wester, & Bryant, 2014). Tissue storage methods and laboratory procedures are described in DeYoung et al (2009) andFoley (2012).…”
Section: Timing Of Conceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimated conception dates were derived from foetal measurements (Hamilton, Tobin, & Moore, 1985). Tissue samples and age of potential sires were collected from males captured or harvested during 1999(DeYoung et al, 2009Foley et al, 2015;Hewitt, Hellickson, Lewis, Wester, & Bryant, 2014). Tissue storage methods and laboratory procedures are described in DeYoung et al (2009) andFoley (2012).…”
Section: Timing Of Conceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional harvest management involved liberal take of antlered males and minimal harvest of females; however, a shift toward more intensive harvest management practices has placed an emphasis on the recruitment of males into older age classes through habitat and population management (Shaw and Harper ), which includes appropriate harvest of females (Hamilton et al ). Greater antler size is typically the goal when increasing male age structure because antler mass and number or points tend to increase with age (Hewitt et al ), although balanced male age structures also benefit population fitness through increased male–male competition (Ditchkoff et al 2001 a , b ) and subsequent female selection (Sullivan et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of 1.5‐year‐old antler size (hereafter yearling antler size) as a criterion for selective harvest management strategies is problematic. If yearlings with larger antlers grow larger antlers later in life compared to yearlings that display smaller antlers (Ott et al , Hewitt et al ), then selectively harvesting young animals could influence genetic structure by increasing intensity of nonrandom hunter selection (Allendorf et al , Mysterud and Bischof ). However, the expression of yearling antler size may be masked by environmental variation (Strickland and Demarais , Monteith et al ) and maternal factors such as parturition date and litter size (Knox et al , Jacobson , Gray et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%