Ageing in the right place – a prototype of a web-based housing counselling intervention for later life

Granbom, Marianne; Szanton, Sarah L.; Gitlin, Laura N.; Paulsson, Ulrika; Zingmark, Magnus

doi:10.1080/11038128.2019.1634756

Cited by 12 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 29 publications

(41 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The first intervention papers included user‐centred iterative designs (Garvelink et al, 2016 ; Granbom et al, 2020 ; Lord et al, 2016 ; van Leersum et al, 2020 ), representing advancement in how the topic was approached. Qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings were used to inform the development of decisional supports (Garvelink et al, 2016 ; Granbom et al, 2020 ; Lord et al, 2016 ; van Leersum et al, 2020 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Shared decision‐making with adults transitioning to long‐term care: A scoping review

Egan

Naughton

Caples

et al. 2022

Int J Older People Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Transitions to long‐term care are challenging for individuals and often associated with a loss of autonomy. Positive experiences are noted, especially when decisions involve the individual in a person‐centred way which are respectful of the person's human rights. One approach which facilitates self‐determination during a transitional period is shared decision‐making, but there is a lack of clarity on the nature and extent of research evidence in this area. Objective The purpose of this scoping review is to identify and document research related to shared decision‐making and transitioning to long‐term care. Methods A comprehensive search in CINAHL, Medline and Psych‐info identified papers which included evidence of shared decision‐making during transitions to a long‐term care setting. The review following the JBI and PAGER framework for scoping reviews. Data were extracted, charted and analysed according to patterns, advances, gaps, research recommendations and evidence for practice. Results Eighteen papers met the inclusion criteria. A body of knowledge was identified encompassing the pattern advancements in shared decision‐making during transitions to long‐term care, representing developments in both the evidence base and methodological approaches. Further patterns offer evidence of the facilitators and barriers experienced by the person, their families and the professional's involved. Conclusions The evidence identified the complexity of such decision‐making with efforts to engage in shared decision‐making often constrained by the availability of resources, the skills of professionals and time. The findings recognise the need for partnership and person‐centred approaches to optimise transitions. The review demonstrates evidence of approaches that can inform future practice and research to support all adult populations who may be faced with a transitional decision to actively participate in decision‐making.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Granbom et al, 2020;Groenvynck et al, 2021;Lord et al, 2016;Mukamel et al, 2016;Manthorpe & Martineau, 2010. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Shared decision‐making with adults transitioning to long‐term care: A scoping review

Egan

Naughton

Caples

et al. 2022

Int J Older People Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When it comes to practical implications, the role of HCB is of a particular importance as control beliefs are modifiable (Tennstedt et al 1998;Petrie et al 2002) and thus, given that they play a role in certain subgroups of the population, could be intervened upon to improve housing environment related health outcomes. For example, taking into consideration HCB and its changes over time might be a useful factor to consider when designing user-centred housing counselling interventions that are currently under development (Granbom et al 2019).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Associations among housing accessibility, housing-related control beliefs and independence in activities of daily living: a cross-sectional study among younger old in Sweden

Gefenaitė

Björk

Schmidt

et al. 2019

J Hous and the Built Environ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is some evidence that housing accessibility, external housing-related control beliefs (HCB) and activities of daily living (ADL) are associated in complex ways; however, these pathways have not been explored in younger old. The aim was to assess the role of external HCB in the relationship between housing accessibility and ADL by applying moderation and mediation models. This was a cross-sectional study involving 366 community-living 67-70 years old participants from the Skåne part of the Swedish National Study of Aging and Care. We assessed moderation by including an interaction term in a logistic regression analysis (significant if p value < 0.05). We assessed mediation with a series of regression analyses with effect size measures expressed as proportion mediated and its 95% confidence interval (CI). In the absence of statistically significant interaction there was no support for external HCB as a moderator. There was evidence for partial mediation as external HCB was associated with ADL when controlled for housing accessibility, while housing accessibility remained associated with independence in ADL when adjusted for external HCB. The proportion mediated was 6% (95% CI 1; 14). While the results did not support external HCB as a moderator, external HCB mediated the association between housing accessibility and ADL. These results were different from previous findings suggesting that external HCB plays a marginally significant moderating and mediating role among very old. Such differences call for further studies that would allow further exploration and validation of the findings at different stages of the ageing process, preferably utilizing longitudinal study designs.

show abstract

“…The Aging in the Right Place was developed by using research circles [ 24 ] involving senior citizens, technology experts, and nonacademic partners. The existing prototype includes 3 modules: THINK, LEARN, and ACT, reflecting different stages of the decision-making process related to housing choices and relocation [ 71 ]. The knowledge gained from Prospective RELOC-AGE will contribute to further development and the finalization of the Aging in the Right Place intervention, which will subsequently be piloted and evaluated in municipality contexts in Sweden.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Associations of Housing, Relocation, and Active and Healthy Aging in Sweden: Protocol for a Prospective Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study

Zingmark¹,

Björk²,

Granbom³

et al. 2021

JMIR Res Protoc

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background While housing and neighborhood features have the potential to impact opportunities for active aging, there is a lack of knowledge related to how older people reason regarding their housing situation and how housing and fulfillment of relocation are associated with active and healthy aging. Objective The objectives of Prospective RELOC-AGE are to study housing choices and relocation and explore effects on active and healthy aging among men and women aged 55 years and older in Sweden considering relocation. Methods The estimated sample (2800) will include people aged 55 years and older being listed for relocation at either of two housing companies: a local public housing company in Southern Sweden and a national condominium provider. Prospective RELOC-AGE has a 2-level longitudinal mixed methods design and includes quantitative surveys (implemented by a professional survey company) and a telephone interview for baseline data collection in 2021, with follow-ups with the same procedures in 2022 and 2023. The survey and interviews include questions related to present housing and neighborhood, relocation plans and expectations, a range of perspectives on active and healthy aging, and demographics. Linking to national registers will provide additional data on home help and health care use, objective housing, and neighborhood characteristics. To explore what housing attributes older adults considering relocation find important and to what extent when making their decisions on housing, we will develop a discrete choice experiment to be implemented with a subsample of participants. Further, a grounded theory approach will be applied to collect in-depth interview data from participants who have moved to another dwelling, within 6 months of the move. A follow-up interview 12 months later will focus on participants’ deepened experience over time in terms of fulfilled expectations and relocation experiences. Results As of submission of this protocol (June 2021), recruitment has commenced with approximately 960 respondents to the survey and ongoing telephone interviews. We anticipate recruitment and data collection based on surveys and interviews to continue during 2021. Conclusions Prospective RELOC-AGE has the capacity to generate new policy-relevant knowledge on associations of housing, relocation, and active and healthy aging. Such knowledge is relevant for the development of proactive approaches to housing in old age on the individual, group, and societal levels. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04765696; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04765696 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/31137

show abstract

Ageing in the right place – a prototype of a web-based housing counselling intervention for later life

Cited by 12 publications

References 29 publications

Shared decision‐making with adults transitioning to long‐term care: A scoping review

Shared decision‐making with adults transitioning to long‐term care: A scoping review

Associations among housing accessibility, housing-related control beliefs and independence in activities of daily living: a cross-sectional study among younger old in Sweden

Exploring Associations of Housing, Relocation, and Active and Healthy Aging in Sweden: Protocol for a Prospective Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About