Aggregation of Individual Preference Structures 
in Ahp-Group Decision Making

Escobar, Marı́a Teresa; Moreno-Jiménez, José Marı́a

doi:10.1007/s10726-006-9050-x

Cited by 146 publications

(71 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Microsoft SQL Server stored procedures are invoked by an admin module to execute AHP algorithms then display the results to decision makers. In the algorithms, the priorities are calculated using the row geometric mean method (RGMM) [26], either aggregation of individual priorities (AIP) for individual participants, or an aggregation of individual judgments (AIJ) [25] based on the weighted geometric mean method (WGMM) of all participants" judgments can calculated, alerts and notifications for judgment exceed level of consistency are implemented. The consistency ratio (CR) and the geometric consistency index (GCI) are calculated.…”

Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Benchmarking the Higher Education Institutions in Egypt using Composite Index Model

El-Hefnawy¹,

El-Bastawissy²,

Kadry³

2014

SpecialIssue

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Egypt has the largest and most significant higher education system in the Middle East and North Africa but it had been continuously facing serious and accumulated challenges. The Higher Education Institutions in Egypt are undergoing important changes involving the development of performance, they are implementing strategies to enhance the overall performance of their universities using ICT, but still the gap between what is existing and what is supposed to be for the selfregulation and improvement processes is not entirely clear to face these challenges. The using of strategic comparative analysis model and tools to evaluate the current and future states will affect the overall performance of universities and shape new paradigms in development of Higher Education System (HES), several studies have investigated the evaluation of universities through the development and use of ranking and benchmark systems In this paper, we provide a model to construct unified Composite Index (CI) based on a set of SMART indictors emulate the nature of higher education systems in Egypt. The outcomes of the proposed model aim to measure overall performance of universities and provide unified benchmarking method in this context.

show abstract

Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Benchmarking the Higher Education Institutions in Egypt using Composite Index Model

El-Hefnawy¹,

El-Bastawissy²,

Kadry³

2014

SpecialIssue

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The initial AHP usually consists the following parts: modelisation, valuation, and priorization and synthesis (Levary and Wan, 1998;Moreno-Jiménez et al, 2008;Tiryaki and Ahlatcioglu, 2009;Hsueh and Kuo, 2016). The detailed processes are as follows (Liu and Shih 2005;Escobar and Morenojiménez, 2007):…”

Section: Ahpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Grey Relational Analysis Method for Group Decision Making in Credit Risk Analysis

2017

EURASIA J MATH SCI T

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In general, group decision making (GDM) under a multiple criteria environment involves multi-criteria, multi-stakeholders and a finite number of alternatives, which can be interpreted as a multi-criteria group decision making. In this paper, a multicriteria group decision making model, based on grey relational analysis, is proposed for credit risk analysis. This model can not only deal with the problems involved multicriteria, multi-stakeholders and a finite number of alternatives, but also reduce individual subjective preference to improve the level of overall satisfaction. In this model, firstly, TOPSIS method is applied for credit risk analysis on four public-listed companies, and the attribute weights are determined by AHP. Then, experts' opinion is integrated on the basis of post-expert information. Finally, grey relational analysis (GRA) method is introduced to gather different experts' opinion to extend the aggregation method for GDM. The empirical results demonstrate and verify that our proposed model for credit risk analysis is feasible and effective, which can be used to support credit risk management and guide business strategy adjustments.

show abstract

“…The priority of each criterion and sub-criterion is calculated by Row Geometric Mean Method (Escobar & Moreno-jiménez, 2007). Global priorities are calculated from the top of hierarchy by multiplying the local priorities of sub-criteria with the priority of their corresponding criteria at the level above.…”

Section: Procedures Of Ahp With Aggregation Of Individual Judgementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Assessing Sustainable Development among Underprivileged Communities

Abdullah¹,

Pang²

2016

JSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the purposes of sustainable development assessment is to identify the most importance criteria and sub-criteria of sustainable development that have the most significant contribution to the local community. To date, few studies have inquired into qualitative methods to assess these criteria and sub-criteria. In response to this gap in the literature, we propose an application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method to prioritize thirteen sub-criteria of sustainable development among underprivileged community of Setiu Wetlands Terengganu. Consistency ratio and weighted geometric mean are the two important computation steps of the AHP prior to proposing global weights of sub-criteria. The computational results indicate that 'Education' is the most important sub-criteria with 15.4 % of global weight. At the other extreme 'global economic partnership' is the least important sub-criteria for this group of community. The outcome of the proposed method is a weight of sustainability for all sub-criteria which offers a guide to government in identifying the appropriate action for uplifting the community quality of life.

show abstract

Aggregation of Individual Preference Structures in Ahp-Group Decision Making

Cited by 146 publications

References 20 publications

Benchmarking the Higher Education Institutions in Egypt using Composite Index Model

Benchmarking the Higher Education Institutions in Egypt using Composite Index Model

Grey Relational Analysis Method for Group Decision Making in Credit Risk Analysis

Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Assessing Sustainable Development among Underprivileged Communities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About