Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects

Abstract

Japan Clinical Trials Register; number: UMIN000011544.

Icare^® rebound tonometers: review of their characteristics and ease of use

“…In our prospective study of healthy older subjects with a mean age of 72 years, Icare TA01i gave lower mean IOP compared to GAT (−2.46±2.10 mmHg; 95% LOA was between −8.25 and 1.66 mmHg). 14 These age-related IOP changes noted using the rebound tonometer were first reported by González-Méijome et al 20 The mean patient age was 45 years (range 18–85 years). They found a negative correlation between age and IOP in the nasal and temporal cornea, but not in the corneal center.…”

“…The repeatability of Icare PRO, recorded as ICC (three sets of IOP readings), was 0.881 14 and 0.863 4 in the sitting position, and 0.656 4 in the supine position.…”

“…The repeatability for Icare TA01i in the sitting position, recorded as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; three sets of IOP readings), was 0.950 9 and 0.934. 14 …”

Transscleral cyclophotocoagulation followed by cataract surgery: a novel protocol to treat refractory acute primary angle closure

“…Second, IOP was measured by noncontact tonometry. Although a good inter-device agreement between Goldmann tonometry and noncontact tonometry has been reported, [27,28] Goldmann tonometry is still the gold standard in IOP assessment. However, Goldmann readings also have their limitations with cloudy, edematous corneas, and Fig.…”

Intraday Repeatability of Bruch's Membrane Opening-Based Neuroretinal Rim Measurements

“…Intraocular pressure was measured by corneal rebound tonometry directly before every SD-OCT examination was initiated (Icare tonometer TA01i; Icare Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland). [25][26][27]…”