2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement between maximum and mean handgrip strength measurements in cancer patients

Abstract: Background and aim Handgrip strength (HGS) can be used to identify probable sarcopenia, by measuring maximum strength and/or through the average of three measurements. This study analyzed the agreement between maximum and mean HGS measurements in identifying probable sarcopenia in cancer patients. Methods Adult individuals of both sexes diagnosed with malignant neoplasm were evaluated. HGS (kg/f) was measured in both hands and nutritional status defined by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, patients with exploratory low HGS were significantly older and had a worse ECOG PS, mGPS score, and geriatric G8 score. Our results are in line with the known association of low HGS with markers of functional and nutritional status [ 18 , 25 ], age [ 26 ], and geriatric G8 score [ 27 ]. These findings support the usefulness of HGS measurement as an interesting additional tool to identify frailty in cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, patients with exploratory low HGS were significantly older and had a worse ECOG PS, mGPS score, and geriatric G8 score. Our results are in line with the known association of low HGS with markers of functional and nutritional status [ 18 , 25 ], age [ 26 ], and geriatric G8 score [ 27 ]. These findings support the usefulness of HGS measurement as an interesting additional tool to identify frailty in cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We used mean values instead of maximum, owing to previous literature showing a good agreement between these two parameters and that in the ELSA study mean values of handgrip strength are usually employed. [ 18 20 ] Abdominal obesity was defined using the traditional cut-offs of 102 cm in men, 88 cm in women [ 21 ]. All respondents were eligible to have their waist and hip measurements taken, unless they were chairbound or had a colostomy or ileostomy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%