AHP-based design method of a lightweight, portable and flexible air-based PV-T module for UAV shelter hangars

Ulloa, Carlos; Núñez, José María Blanco; Lin, Cheng-Xian; Rey, Guillermo

doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.099

Cited by 23 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the AHP method has several advantages, it cannot be separated from the shortcomings, the method is less effective if it is used in cases that have a large number of criteria and alternatives. Other methods are needed to be combined in order to obtain more effective results [6][7][8]. AHP when used to rank requires a relatively longer time and only compares between criteria, there is no normalization process and calculation of its costs and benefits [9,10,12].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decision Support System for Determining Critical Land in Klaten Regency

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Critical land has become a problem in the world. Critical land is very detrimental to the health of the land. Several factors cause the land to become critical. One of them is the use of land that is not by the capabilities of the land. If no repairs made, the land will be physically, chemically, and biologically damaged. Klaten Regency is one of the regencies in Central Java Province, which has quite extensive critical land. It is necessary to monitor and improve land quality regularly to avoid critical land problems. Data and information on critical land obtained from Klaten Regency processed into a decision support system. Decision Support System uses a combination of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique For Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods. In this research, a Web-based Decision Support System created to determine the critical land area in Klaten Regency. The information system created has an alternative menu and criteria that determine the potential of critical land in Klaten Regency, making it easier for users to obtain information.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decision Support System for Determining Critical Land in Klaten Regency

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Finally, the comprehensive weight value or relative merit order of the lowest layer (for decision-making schemes, measures, etc.) relative to the highest layer (total target) is calculated and determined [6][7] .…”

Section: Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on Home Chairs Design Evaluation for Low-and Middle-income Groups Based on User Experience

Leng

Zhang

Dai

2020

int.jour.sci.res.mana.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pay attention to the home living environment of low-and middle-income groups, study the user-centered design evaluation method to guide the design of home chairs suitable for low-and middle-income groups. Introducing Analytic Hierarchy Process（AHP）into home chairs’ design evaluation, it establishes a different layer and different elements structure model based on sensory experience, behavioral experience, emotional experience and economic experience from the point of user experience. Scoring each element, it calculates and determines the weight value of every element, and forms an evaluation method of home chairs for low-and middle-income Groups. Using the method to evaluate the design schemes of 3 home chairs, it obtains the optimal scheme. Then, surveying the market sales data to verify the accuracy of the result. The evaluation method consists of four major elements: sensory experience(B1), 27%; behavior experience(B2), 41%; emotional experience(B3), 10%; economic experience(B4), 22%. The method can effectively solve the complex comparison of multiple elements in design evaluation and provide a comprehensive method combining qualitative and quantitative methods for product design, and provides reference for products design and evaluation of the same type

show abstract

“…Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), developed by Saaty in 1971, is mainly employed to provide a quick way to reduce complicated decisions. Ulloa et al (2018) proposed applying AHP to the appearance design of PV-T module of DRONEs. Finally, Arduino was used as a model to verify and test the experimental data.…”

Section: Analytic Hierarchy Process Ahpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using FCE and FAHP to Explore the multirotor drone appearance preference

Hsiao¹,

Peng²

2020

Proceedings of DRS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Every year there are new products on the market for drones prompting designers to spend a lot of time collecting data and analyzing product style trends in the market. However, it takes more time for new designers to understand consumers' evolving preferences. Therefore, this study proposes an evaluation model for DRONE appearance design. The method uses Morphological Analysis to extract product appearance characteristics, and uses fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to establish DRONE appearance in addition to preference analysis. It obtained the degree of importance that consumers attach to each component; the result weights that consumers attach were then analyzed to determine that the overall preference for the appearance of DRONEs is objective. In this way, the researchers or designers subsequently executing procedure can establish a modelling database and apply it to the process of rapid design.

show abstract

AHP-based design method of a lightweight, portable and flexible air-based PV-T module for UAV shelter hangars

Cited by 23 publications

References 50 publications

Decision Support System for Determining Critical Land in Klaten Regency

Decision Support System for Determining Critical Land in Klaten Regency

Study on Home Chairs Design Evaluation for Low-and Middle-income Groups Based on User Experience

Using FCE and FAHP to Explore the multirotor drone appearance preference

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About