2015
DOI: 10.14509/shoreline
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alaska shoreline change tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the vegetation is very natural. However caution should be used when using the vegetation line as an indicator of the coastline, in areas where human practices can significantly alter the position of the coastline (Gould et al, 2015, Gibbs et al, 2015. Despite the limitations of the computer-aided photointerpretation methodology, the results on rates of change on the studied coastline are comparable to the work of the authors who had to work on the issue at the scale in West Africa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Therefore the vegetation is very natural. However caution should be used when using the vegetation line as an indicator of the coastline, in areas where human practices can significantly alter the position of the coastline (Gould et al, 2015, Gibbs et al, 2015. Despite the limitations of the computer-aided photointerpretation methodology, the results on rates of change on the studied coastline are comparable to the work of the authors who had to work on the issue at the scale in West Africa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%