2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-006-0605-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alignment of Displaced or Impacted Teeth with the Traction Chain

Abstract: To align those teeth in the dental arch that cannot erupt or are displaced, they must be surgically exposed. After the traction device is attached, the tooth is again covered with the mucoperiosteal flap to protect the tissues involved. For this reason, the loss of this traction device must be absolutely avoided in order to prevent another surgical intervention. Here at the University of Ulm, we have developed and tested an optimized traction chain for that purpose. The chain is attached to the tooth with a la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods include the K-9 spring ( Shastri et al, 2014 ), the ballista spring ( Jacoby, 1979 ), the cantilever spring ( Nakandakari et al, 2016 ), elastomeric chains ( Yadav et al, 2011 ) or threads, and piggyback (double archwire) ( Sandler et al, 1999 ). Indeed, the traction phase of the impacted canines used to be considered possible only by the traction method with fixed appliances ( Kornhauser et al, 1996 ; Sander et al, 2006 ) or min-implants ( De Clerck et al, 2002 ; Heravi et al, 2014 , 2016 ). However, compared with the fixed appliance and mini-implants, the traction method with clear aligners has the advantages of being more aesthetically pleasing, clean, and non-invasive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods include the K-9 spring ( Shastri et al, 2014 ), the ballista spring ( Jacoby, 1979 ), the cantilever spring ( Nakandakari et al, 2016 ), elastomeric chains ( Yadav et al, 2011 ) or threads, and piggyback (double archwire) ( Sandler et al, 1999 ). Indeed, the traction phase of the impacted canines used to be considered possible only by the traction method with fixed appliances ( Kornhauser et al, 1996 ; Sander et al, 2006 ) or min-implants ( De Clerck et al, 2002 ; Heravi et al, 2014 , 2016 ). However, compared with the fixed appliance and mini-implants, the traction method with clear aligners has the advantages of being more aesthetically pleasing, clean, and non-invasive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For their extrusion-spring arm, Terry & Thomson [37] recommend a degree of activation equalling the pressure of a finger in the direction of the tooth; McDonald & Yap [23] draw with 5/16" heavy-pull elastics replaced daily, and neither Pearson et al [26] nor Sander et al [31]. recommend any particular amount of force.…”
Section: Ergebnissementioning
confidence: 99%