2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality among Users of Basal Insulins NPH, Detemir, and Glargine

Abstract: BackgroundInsulin therapy in type 2 diabetes may increase mortality and cancer incidence, but the impact of different types of basal insulins on these endpoints is unclear. Compared to the traditional NPH insulin, the newer, longer-acting insulin analogues detemir and glargine have shown benefits in randomized controlled trials. Whether these advantages translate into lower mortality among users in real life is unknown.ObjectiveTo estimate the differences in all-cause and cause-specific mortality rates between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The total number of patients in the remaining fair‐quality trials was 2762, with 12‐52 weeks of treatment. We included 12 observational studies (eight with hypoglycaemia outcomes and four with cancer outcomes), of which one was poor quality …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The total number of patients in the remaining fair‐quality trials was 2762, with 12‐52 weeks of treatment. We included 12 observational studies (eight with hypoglycaemia outcomes and four with cancer outcomes), of which one was poor quality …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found low‐strength evidence of no difference in the risk of any cancer or of breast cancer between detemir and glargine. Evidence on cancer mortality with glargine or detemir was insufficient to draw conclusions . Three retrospective cohort studies and a case‐control study (N = 240 101) evaluated the association of insulin exposure with a diagnosis of any cancer, and three cohort studies reported on the risk of breast cancer .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…и соавт. (2015) [60], исследований, использующих твердые (не суррогатные) конечные точки для оценки клинической эффективности и безопасности различных режимов инсулинотерапии у пациентов с СД2, чтобы подтвердить или исключить неблагоприятные сердечно-сосудистые эффекты дли-тельной терапии экзогенным инсулином, пока недоста-точно.…”
Section: безопасность комбинации инкретиновых препаратов с инсулиномunclassified