Allocation flexibility for agribusiness supply chains under market demand disruption

Behzadi, Golnar; O'Sullivan, Michael J.; Olsen, Tava Lennon; Zhang, Abraham

doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1349955

Cited by 53 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, literature on the SC ripple effect allows deducing the SC viability antecedents and drivers (Ivanov et al 2014a, b;Garvey et al 2015;Dolgui et al 2018;Levner and Ptuskin 2018;Scheibe and Blackhurst 2018;Hosseini and Ivanov 2019;Ivanov et al 2019a;Kinra et al 2020;Li et al 2019;Mishra et al 2019;Sinha et al 2020;Dixit et al 2020;Dolgui et al 2020b;Garvey and Carnovale 2020;Goldbeck et al 2020;Li and Zobel 2020;Özçelik et al 2020). Most of the SC resilience studies build their arguments around capacity and inventory reservations as well as back-up suppliers to cope with SC disruptions (Behzadi et al 2018;Chen et al 2011;Lücker et al 2017Lücker et al , 2019Hosseini et al 2019b;Ivanov and Rozhkov 2017;Paul et al 2019;Paul and Rahman 2018;Sawik 2016Sawik , 2019Schmitt et al 2017;Song et al 2018;Spiegler et al 2016Spiegler et al , 2017Yin and Wang 2018;Yoon et al 2018). Some studies extended the operational discussion toward the product substitution and process/product modularity as mitigation and recovery policies (Lu et al 2011;Gupta and Ivanov 2020).…”

Section: Multi-structural Vsc Viewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Viability is the ability of a supply chain (SC) to maintain itself and survive in a changing environment through a redesign of structures and replanning of performance with long-term impacts. In this paper, we theorize a new notion—the viable supply chain (VSC). In our approach, viability is considered as an underlying SC property spanning three perspectives, i.e., agility, resilience, and sustainability. The principal ideas of the VSC model are adaptable structural SC designs for supply–demand allocations and, most importantly, establishment and control of adaptive mechanisms for transitions between the structural designs. Further, we demonstrate how the VSC components can be categorized across organizational, informational, process-functional, technological, and financial structures. Moreover, our study offers a VSC framework within an SC ecosystem. We discuss the relations between resilience and viability. Through the lens and guidance of dynamic systems theory, we illustrate the VSC model at the technical level. The VSC model can be of value for decision-makers to design SCs that can react adaptively to both positive changes (i.e., the agility angle) and be able to absorb negative disturbances, recover and survive during short-term disruptions and long-term, global shocks with societal and economical transformations (i.e., the resilience and sustainability angles). The VSC model can help firms in guiding their decisions on recovery and re-building of their SCs after global, long-term crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. We emphasize that resilience is the central perspective in the VSC guaranteeing viability of the SCs of the future. Emerging directions in VSC research are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Multi-structural Vsc Viewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This paper seeks to bring the discussion forward and develop a framework for a mutual analysis of SC digital technology and disruption risk effects which may cause structural dynamics in the SC and the ripple effect (Dolgui, Ivanov, and Sokolov 2018;Pavlov et al, 2018). Disruptions which affect the integrity of SC dynamics might include fires at distribution centres, floods and tsunamis at production facilities, supplier legal conflicts or strikes at airlines or railway companies (Tang 2006;Chopra and Sodhi 2014;Ho et al 2015;Simchi-Levi et al 2015;Mizgier 2017;Behzadi et al 2018, to name a few).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics

Ivanov

Dolgui

Sokolov

2018

International Journal of Production Research

1,250

641

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The impact of digitalisation and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and disruption risk control analytics in the supply chain (SC) is studied. The research framework combines the results from two isolated areas, i.e. the impact of digitalisation on SC management (SCM) and the impact of SCM on the ripple effect control. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that connects business, information, engineering and analytics perspectives on digitalisation and SC risks. This paper does not pretend to be encyclopedic, but rather analyses recent literature and case-studies seeking to bring the discussion further with the help of a conceptual framework for researching the relationships between digitalisation and SC disruptions risks. In addition, it emerges with an SC risk analytics framework. It analyses perspectives and future transformations that can be expected in transition towards cyber-physical SCs. With these two frameworks, this study contributes to the literature by answering the questions of (1) what relations exist between big data analytics, Industry 4.0, additive manufacturing, advanced trace & tracking systems and SC disruption risks; (2) how digitalisation can contribute to enhancing ripple effect control; and (3) what digital technology-based extensions can trigger the developments towards SC risk analytics.

show abstract

“…In short, disruption lays bare SC structural dynamics (Ivanov and Sokolov 2010, Ivanov et al 2010, 2013, 2014a, 2017a,b, Choi et al 2016, Scheibe and Blackhurts 2017, Ouang and Hara 2017, Ivanov 2018. Disruptions which affect the integrity of the SC dynamic might include fires at distribution centres, floods and tsunamis at production facilities, supplier legal conflicts, or strikes at airlines or railway companies (Tang 2006, Chopra and Sodhi 2014, Simchi-Levi et al 2015, Ho et al 2015, Behzadi et al 2017, Mizgier 2017. Table 1 summarizes recent disruptions and their impacts on performance in the SC.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature

Dolgui

Ivanov

Sokolov

2017

International Journal of Production Research

615

361

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

show abstract

Allocation flexibility for agribusiness supply chains under market demand disruption

Cited by 53 publications

References 48 publications

Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic

Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic

The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics

Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About