2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alma-Imf

Abstract: Aims. Thanks to the high angular resolution, sensitivity, image fidelity, and frequency coverage of ALMA, we aim to improve our understanding of star formation. One of the breakthroughs expected from ALMA, which is the basis of our Cycle 5 ALMA-IMF Large Program, is the question of the origin of the initial mass function (IMF) of stars. Here we present the ALMA-IMF protocluster selection, first results, and scientific prospects. Methods. ALMA-IMF imaged a total noncontiguous area of ~53 pc2, covering extreme, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a direct comparison with these projects is not straightforward: there are differences in the source extraction algorithms, the specifics of the ALMA observations and the estimation of the dust mass (due to different assumptions of the dust temperatures and of the parameters used in Equation 1). In particular, the spatial resolution of those surveys is higher than that of SQUALO (≃ 1000 AU in CORE, Beuther et al (2018), and ≃ 2000 AU in ALMA-IMF, Motte et al (2022)), compared to ≃ 4700 AU on average of this work, see Table 2). Both these works have identified objects smaller than the ones found in our survey.…”
Section: Fragments Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, a direct comparison with these projects is not straightforward: there are differences in the source extraction algorithms, the specifics of the ALMA observations and the estimation of the dust mass (due to different assumptions of the dust temperatures and of the parameters used in Equation 1). In particular, the spatial resolution of those surveys is higher than that of SQUALO (≃ 1000 AU in CORE, Beuther et al (2018), and ≃ 2000 AU in ALMA-IMF, Motte et al (2022)), compared to ≃ 4700 AU on average of this work, see Table 2). Both these works have identified objects smaller than the ones found in our survey.…”
Section: Fragments Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The snapshots are selected to sample the following values of the cloud's instantaneous star-formation efficiency (SFE), which are defined as the ratio of the mass in sinks over the total mass in sinks and gas. These correspond to values of the SFE from relatively quiescent clouds (e.g., Battersby et al 2014;Wang et al 2014;Lin et al 2017) to active massive starformation regions (e.g., Lin et al 2016;Motte et al 2022;Traficante et al 2023). The selected snapshots correspond to times t = [0.8, 1.6, 3.3, 5.7, 6.3, 7.6] Myr after the first star is born, with the highest value approximately corresponding to the moment when feedback by supernovae might become relevant.…”
Section: Hydrodynamical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the hydrodynamical simulation that is analyzed in this work does not attempt to reproduce any specific real region, given the physics it includes and characteristics such as surface density and filamentary clump morphology, we expect it to share similar characteristics to those of massive starforming regions observed in the Galaxy (e.g., Liu et al 2012;Galván-Madrid et al 2013;Motte et al 2022;Traficante et al 2023).…”
Section: Comparison To Galactic Star-forming Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the contribution of free-free emission, we used the H40α hydrogen recombination line observations under the assumption of local thermodynamical equilibrium and optically thin emission. The free-free emission intensity was estimated via the following relation (e.g., Motte et al 2022):…”
Section: Derived Parameters Of Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%