35. Jahrestagung Der Deutschen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Zum Studium Der Leber 2019
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1677084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered Fgf21 response in alcohol induced “Acute-on-chronic liver injury” (ACLI) model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that FGF21 resistance is characterized by increased levels of circulating FGF21 levels concomitant with decreased FGF21 receptor expression (33)(34)(35), these findings suggest that our ethanol treatments produced a state of FGF21 resistance. Meanwhile, our GSIS, cell death rate, and cell viability data showing that short-term ethanol exposure did not impair β-cell function or survival support the hypothesis that FGF21 may protect pancreatic islets from ethanol-induced pancreatic islet damage similar to the way that it has been shown to be protective against ethanol-induced hepatic damage and the progression of alcoholic liver disease in an acute alcohol drinking model (36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Given that FGF21 resistance is characterized by increased levels of circulating FGF21 levels concomitant with decreased FGF21 receptor expression (33)(34)(35), these findings suggest that our ethanol treatments produced a state of FGF21 resistance. Meanwhile, our GSIS, cell death rate, and cell viability data showing that short-term ethanol exposure did not impair β-cell function or survival support the hypothesis that FGF21 may protect pancreatic islets from ethanol-induced pancreatic islet damage similar to the way that it has been shown to be protective against ethanol-induced hepatic damage and the progression of alcoholic liver disease in an acute alcohol drinking model (36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%