Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth

Hodnett, Ellen; Downe, Soo; Walsh, Denis

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000012.pub4

Cited by 198 publications

(194 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

173

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Outsiders often see women who embrace long standing traditions of childbirth in their communities as unaware of 'real risks' (Obermeyer, 2000). Yet many factors encompassing perceptions, culture, tradition, rituals, spirituality, familial social relationships, birth place and birth supports, are considered important aspects of childbirth (Callister, 1995;Downe, 2007;Hodnett et al, 2007;Liamputtong, 2009;Hodnett et al, 2010;Walsh, 2010;Douglas, 2011;Lori and Boyle, 2011).…”

Section: Safety and Riskmentioning

confidence: 99%

Childbirth traditions and cultural perceptions of safety in Nepal: Critical spaces to ensure the survival of mothers and newborns in remote mountain villages

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Safety and Riskmentioning

confidence: 99%

Childbirth traditions and cultural perceptions of safety in Nepal: Critical spaces to ensure the survival of mothers and newborns in remote mountain villages

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In fact, the planned place of birth might shape both women's expectations and experiences of birth, with impacts on maternal satisfaction (Birthrights, 2013;Dahlen et al, 2010;Overgaard et al, 2012;Waldenstrom and Nilsson, 1993), clinical outcomes and medical interventions (Hodnett et al, 2010;Sandall et al, 2013;Sutcliffe et al, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The kaleidoscopic midwife: A conceptual metaphor illustrating first-time mothers' perspectives of a good midwife during childbirth. A grounded theory study

2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

show abstract

“…En Chile, el modelo convencional de atención profesional de parto (ME), ha demostrado ser seguro y de alta competencia técnica, con cifras de morbimortalidad maternas-perinatales comparables con los países desarrollados (12), no obstante, reportando altas cifras de intervencionismo, particularmente con la cesárea. El modelo evaluado en este estudio (MASIP), o "centro de parto alternativo", según otros autores (19), resultó ser un modelo focalizado en la calidad, manteniendo los estándares de seguridad de los modelos de alta intervención.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Modelo de asistencia integral del parto: Concepto de integralidad basado en la calidad y seguridad

et al. 2018

Rev. chil. obstet. ginecol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Worldwide there is a need to reduce the use of excessive technology during childbirth. Consequently, there is an interest to develop respectful and personalized models of care. Chile has one of the highest C-section rates in the region, many of which are not needed. A FONDEF project developed and tested a comprehensive health care model in childbirth (MASIP), considering active participation of women and families and less unneeded clinical interventions. Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of MASIP in comparison with standard care. Methods: a randomized controlled experiment was conducted in one public hospital in Santiago Chile. Two arms were compared: MASIP vs. standard care. Low obstetric risk women were included. Variables of interest included quality and safety measures. Results: MASIP had better quality results, such as maternal wellbeing and less clinical interventions. During the study c-section was lower in both arms in comparison to a historical record of the same population. Safety outcomes were similar in both arms. Conclusion: MASIP is as safe as the standard care but it has better quality of care. Interventions to improve users' satisfaction and experience should consider the components of MASIP.

show abstract

Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth

Cited by 198 publications

References 29 publications

Childbirth traditions and cultural perceptions of safety in Nepal: Critical spaces to ensure the survival of mothers and newborns in remote mountain villages

Childbirth traditions and cultural perceptions of safety in Nepal: Critical spaces to ensure the survival of mothers and newborns in remote mountain villages

The kaleidoscopic midwife: A conceptual metaphor illustrating first-time mothers' perspectives of a good midwife during childbirth. A grounded theory study

Modelo de asistencia integral del parto: Concepto de integralidad basado en la calidad y seguridad

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About