1997
DOI: 10.1007/s004420050246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altitudinal variation for senescence in Melanoplus grasshoppers

Abstract: We describe differences in senescence among populations of grasshoppers that occur along an altitudinal gradient in the Sierra Nevada, California. Experimental males from five populations of the Melanoplus sanguinipes/devastator sibling species complex were reared in each of two thermal culture conditions from eggs of field-caught females. In both culture conditions, we measured the survival of adult cohorts from each population. Differences in the physiological capacity to survive in a sheltered, common envir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
68
3
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
68
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first involves comparisons between two or more field-collected biotypes such as between guppy biotypes collected from streams that differ in predation levels (Reznick et al ., 1996(Reznick et al ., , 2001, between grasshopper biotypes collected from regions of the Sierra Nevada that differ in altitude (Tatar et al ., 1997), and between rotifer species collected from the wild that differ in preferred habitats (Kirk, 1997). The second type of comparison is between biotypes that differ in degrees of laboratory selection such as between laboratory-adapted and wild-type lines of Drosophila melanogaster (Sgro & Partridge, 2000;Linnen et al ., 2001) or between laboratory vs. wild-derived mice (Miller et al ., 2000(Miller et al ., , 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first involves comparisons between two or more field-collected biotypes such as between guppy biotypes collected from streams that differ in predation levels (Reznick et al ., 1996(Reznick et al ., , 2001, between grasshopper biotypes collected from regions of the Sierra Nevada that differ in altitude (Tatar et al ., 1997), and between rotifer species collected from the wild that differ in preferred habitats (Kirk, 1997). The second type of comparison is between biotypes that differ in degrees of laboratory selection such as between laboratory-adapted and wild-type lines of Drosophila melanogaster (Sgro & Partridge, 2000;Linnen et al ., 2001) or between laboratory vs. wild-derived mice (Miller et al ., 2000(Miller et al ., , 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ascertaining the relative contributions of the nonmutually exclusive genetic mechanisms will not illuminate whether the general theory adequately explains the wide diversity of senescence patterns found in nature. Relatively little work has examined the ecological context of senescence evolution (Reznick 1993;Tatar et al 1997;Dudycha 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies concerned with aging in the wild have traditionally focused on either survival estimates using mark-recapture techniques (Caughley 1977;Austad 1993;Krebs 1999) or relatively rough life table differences between cohorts that were subjected to different selection pressures in the field (Reznick et al 2004;Tatar et al 1997). The applicability of these tools for demographic analysis is limited, as age-distribution information is not provided, in contrast to residual demography.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%