1998
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.1998.11682495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altitudinal variation in size effects on plant reproductive effort and somatic costs of reproduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in line with earlier studies where no reproductive costs were found (Horvitz and Schemske 1988;Calvo 1990;Fox and Stevens 1991;Jennersten 1991). For example, Jöns-son and Tuomi (1994) and Hemborg (1998) discussed the existence of strong selection against individual plants expressing high reproductive costs, and Hemborg (1998) proposed further that reproductive investment is often negatively related to altitude and short growing seasons. On the other hand, Calvo (1990) postulated that perennials may store resources not currently invested and buffer reproduction and growth in short periods later on.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results are in line with earlier studies where no reproductive costs were found (Horvitz and Schemske 1988;Calvo 1990;Fox and Stevens 1991;Jennersten 1991). For example, Jöns-son and Tuomi (1994) and Hemborg (1998) discussed the existence of strong selection against individual plants expressing high reproductive costs, and Hemborg (1998) proposed further that reproductive investment is often negatively related to altitude and short growing seasons. On the other hand, Calvo (1990) postulated that perennials may store resources not currently invested and buffer reproduction and growth in short periods later on.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, in high altitudes cost of reproduction can be minimized, especially in long-lived plants, as a result of weather anomalies which often cause reproductive failure. The saved resources may contribute to reducing reproductive cost in years of fruit production (Hemborg 1998;Hemborg and Karlsson 1998;Obeso 2002).…”
Section: Radial Growth Increment (Mean) (Mm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small size is expected to reflect adaptation to harsher conditions and to shorter growing seasons, and is a common feature of alpine ecotypes in native species (e.g., Blanckenhorn 1997;Clausen et al 1941;Galen et al 1991;Körner 1999). Along elevationnal gradients, native herbaceous species were found to show a decrease in plant size and growth rate (Hemborg and Karlsson 1998;von Arx et al 2006). This parallels clinal variation in size that has been observed in different invasive species, including both plants and animals, along latitudinal gradients that may represent similar climatic variation (e.g., Huey et al 2000;Kollmann and Banuelos 2004;Weber and Schmid 1998).…”
Section: Adaptive Mechanisms Leading To Clinal Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%