ESO Astrophysics Symposia European Southern Observatory
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-76963-7_63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AMBER on the VLTI: Data Processing and Calibration Issues

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same methods as in Štefl et al (2009) were applied to derive absolute and differential quantities for visibilities, phases, and closure phases across the Br γ line. Following the recommendation by Tatulli et al (2007) and Millour et al (2008), only the top 50% of the frames with the best S /N were averaged for calibrators as well as science targets to derive the transfer function and obtain absolutely calibrated spectra. However, because of the setting inconsistency between the science target and the calibrator, only the differential visibilities and phases were derived for ζ Tau.…”
Section: Interferometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same methods as in Štefl et al (2009) were applied to derive absolute and differential quantities for visibilities, phases, and closure phases across the Br γ line. Following the recommendation by Tatulli et al (2007) and Millour et al (2008), only the top 50% of the frames with the best S /N were averaged for calibrators as well as science targets to derive the transfer function and obtain absolutely calibrated spectra. However, because of the setting inconsistency between the science target and the calibrator, only the differential visibilities and phases were derived for ζ Tau.…”
Section: Interferometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ratio provides the most stable transfer function, see discussion in Tatulli et al (2007) and Millour et al (2007). -The transfer function was estimated by averaging all observations of the calibration stars.…”
Section: Interferometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows us to limit the fringe smearing effect (also called "jitter" effect) and the coherence length visibility loss due to the atmospheric OPD (described in Millour et al 2007). The following steps (transfer function estimation, calibration) were completed using a new set of custom-made scripts described by Millour et al (2008 2 ); -an approach using bootstrapping, roughly explained in Tatulli et al (2007) and described in more detail in Cruzalèbes et al (2007).…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%