Ambitious for change? A critical appraisal of the Canadian indicator framework of the sustainable development goals

Abstract

This article explores the indicators and targets identified in the Canadian Indicator Framework, a localization of the UN Sustainable Development Goals for the country of Canada. Applying a critical theoretical lens and a human rights approach, the authors explore each of the ‘ambitions’ proposed by the federal government and assess their suitability in meeting the magnitude of transformative change that will be necessary to meet the goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In considering each of the Canadian ambitions proposed to realize Sustainable Development Goals 1 to 17, and the framework as a whole, the authors conclude that a business-as-usual stance has been applied. Many of the Canadian ambitions have ‘no specific target’ identified, offering no baseline measures or concrete standards from which to benchmark and monitor progress. The ones that do are not tremendously transformative, leading to a framework that does not present a dramatic departure from existing policy and practice arrangements. The character of the Canadian ambitions to the Sustainable Development Goals are revealed, not as concrete change strategies, but as mere aspirations, albeit more for the status quo than for transformational action. To translate the Canadian ambitions into actions, human rights must be infused into the Canadian Indicator Framework, and these must be substantive, de facto, rights—rights that people can actually claim, and hold state actors accountable to.

Enhancing Urban Sustainability by Integrating MCDM and Model of GIS Spatial Analysis in Al-Nasiriyah Heritage Center‎ Development

“…By 2015, sustainability in the UK encompassed social, economic, environmental, and cultural aspects, establishing cultural sustainability as the fourth pillar widely adopted in international policies, particularly in European cities [24].…”

Trading off sustainable development in Canadian cities: theoretical implications of SDG 11 indicator aggregation approaches

“…Most of them are either without a target or missing data to report up-to-date progress (Government of Canada, 2023b). Without clear benchmarking and no concrete measurement and reporting framework, CIF is not helping to demonstrate a decisive move toward the progress necessary to realize the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development (Smith-Carrier, 2023). Therefore, developing a methodology capable of incorporating multidisciplinary and multicriteria aggregation and flexibility to accommodate contextual variations is crucial.…”