2008
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2008.916266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AMIRAS—An Airborne MIRAS Demonstrator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the SMOS development, measurements acquired by AMIRAS (airborne MIRAS) [7] and HUT-2D [8] demonstrators have proved the validity of the visibility function proposed by Prof. Corbella. The method to experimentally validate the visibility function is measuring homogeneous targets since the visibility equation becomes directly proportional to the contrast between the brightness temperature of the target and the backward noise of the receivers emitted through the antennas.…”
Section: Validation Using Airborne Datamentioning
confidence: 71%
“…During the SMOS development, measurements acquired by AMIRAS (airborne MIRAS) [7] and HUT-2D [8] demonstrators have proved the validity of the visibility function proposed by Prof. Corbella. The method to experimentally validate the visibility function is measuring homogeneous targets since the visibility equation becomes directly proportional to the contrast between the brightness temperature of the target and the backward noise of the receivers emitted through the antennas.…”
Section: Validation Using Airborne Datamentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This experiment was used to measure the instrument's response to a constant target and also to make an image of the Galaxy over-pass (Martin-Neira et al 2008). Figure 15 shows the instrument placed at the IRTA facilities and the first image of the Milky Way obtained by AMIRAS.…”
Section: The Small Airborne Miras Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous measurement campaigns, the measurement experimental error is expected to be lower than 1 dB [31]- [33].…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%