2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amnestic MCI future clinical status prediction using baseline MRI features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their prediction model, only hippocampus was used which, achieved a predictive performance comparable or superior to other studies [45], [99], [122] that employed a multi-region or whole brain approach. This was similar to the accuracy achieved using other predictive models based on non-automated techniques.…”
Section: Prediction Based On Shape Analysismentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their prediction model, only hippocampus was used which, achieved a predictive performance comparable or superior to other studies [45], [99], [122] that employed a multi-region or whole brain approach. This was similar to the accuracy achieved using other predictive models based on non-automated techniques.…”
Section: Prediction Based On Shape Analysismentioning
confidence: 76%
“…When the anterior cingulate gyrus and orbitofrontal cortex were included in the measurements, the best predictive accuracy obtained was 75%. Duchesne et al [122] used only MTL in their VBM analysis and their results were better compared to other studies (see Table VII) that used the whole brain.…”
Section: A Prediction Based On Vbmmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the area of predicting conversion from MCI to AD, the methodology is related to a number of other neuroimaging techniques for estimation of atrophic changes [6,[9][10][11][12][13][14] and classification [18][19][20][21][22]. Some of the approaches require manual interaction [9,10,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies do not perform individual patient classification, but group analysis or correlation with clinical scores [6,[9][10][11][12][13][14]. The voxel-wise measure that is derived in this study is mainly based on the gray value intensities found in the image, while other studies are based on features like volumetric measures [6,[9][10][11]13,14], measures of cortical thickness [12], shape-or deformation-based features [18,20,21], or tissue classification [19,22]. Duchesne et al [21] work directly on voxel intensities and combine them with deformation-based features from the registration process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation