2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejop.2020.125727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amoeboid protist systematics: A report on the “Systematics of amoeboid protists” symposium at the VIIIth ECOP/ISOP meeting in Rome, 2019

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 constitute the type, as illustrations can constitute a type in testate amoebae (Lara et al. 2020); in addition, a stub has been deposited at the Royal Botanical Garden of Madrid RJB‐MA‐Algae 11249.…”
Section: Taxonomic Actsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 constitute the type, as illustrations can constitute a type in testate amoebae (Lara et al. 2020); in addition, a stub has been deposited at the Royal Botanical Garden of Madrid RJB‐MA‐Algae 11249.…”
Section: Taxonomic Actsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, their habitats are geographically remote, and no molecular data are available for Page's strain. The extent of cryptic speciation has been getting more and more evident among the naked lobose amoebae recently (Kudryavtsev, Pawlowski, 2015;Tekle, Wood, 2018;Mesentsev, Smirnov, 2019;Kudryavtsev, Volkova, 2020;Lara et al, 2020;Mesentsev et al, 2020). For example, among the small dactylopodid amoebae that belong to the genus Cunea no sound morphological differences were found between three strains showing significant variation in their molecular sequences and ecological preferences (Kudryavtsev, Pawlowski, 2015;Kudryavtsev, Volkova, 2020).…”
Section: Glycocalyx Nmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although morphologically (almost) indistinguishable these so-called “pseudocryptic” species do differ from each other according their ecological preferences (Singer et al, 2018) and their global distributions (Singer et al, 2019). The combination of barcoding, distributional and ecological evidence indicates that these taxa should be considered as true biological species (Lara et al, 2020). Given the difficulties with identification of some taxa based solely on their morphology, a molecular approach is required for the collection of reliable distributional assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%