2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4990916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AMT and gravity across praTertiary rock complex of Kebumen, Central Java, Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result contradicts the theory of Dakah as the center of the volcanism (Setiawan et al, 2011), and the idea of an intrusion in Mount Parang (Kamtono, 1995). The resistivity model agrees with Laesanpura et al (2017), who suggested the sill nature of the volcanic rock due to the discontinuity to the depth. However, we prefer the non-in-situ origin of the volcanic bodies because of their singularity and relatively small characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The result contradicts the theory of Dakah as the center of the volcanism (Setiawan et al, 2011), and the idea of an intrusion in Mount Parang (Kamtono, 1995). The resistivity model agrees with Laesanpura et al (2017), who suggested the sill nature of the volcanic rock due to the discontinuity to the depth. However, we prefer the non-in-situ origin of the volcanic bodies because of their singularity and relatively small characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…He described an igneous body of intrusion cut through the higher densities environment, which is associated with the tectonic mélange complex. Later, Laesanpura (Laesanpura, Dahrin, & Sugianto, 2017) applied the 1-D Audio-magnetotellurics (AMT) at 3 (three) stations. The three 1D inversion models did not show any continuity in the subsurface layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More interesting results could be shown with 3D model for the next work. More integrated results form the lattest publication in this area (such as: [15], [16], [17], and [18]) can be integrated in the next interpretation report.…”
Section: Inverse Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%