2018
DOI: 10.11606/issn.2316-9079.v17i1p39-59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An acoustic and morphometric evaluation of the geographic distribution of Phyllomedusa burmeisteri (Anura: Phyllomedusidae), with comments on P. bahiana

Abstract: An acoustic and morphometric evaluation of the geographic distribution of Phyllomedusa burmeisteri (Anura: Phyllomedusidae), with comments on P. bahiana. A recent study, based on phylogenetic and phylogeographic multilocus approaches, detected two evolutionary units (BUR and BUR-RJ) within the range of P. burmeisteri. BUR has a wide distribution, whereas BUR-RJ is restricted to a small area coincident with the Serra do Mar mountain range in the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro. We evaluate if acoustic and mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar pattern was also observed regarding the advertisement calls from others species belonging to the Phyllomedusidae family (e.g. Phyllomedusa burmeisteri vs. P. bahiana, Andrade et al 2018; Pithecopus nordestinus vs. P. azureus, Haga et al 2017). In these cases, the authors did not find acoustic traits to distinguish the studied species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A similar pattern was also observed regarding the advertisement calls from others species belonging to the Phyllomedusidae family (e.g. Phyllomedusa burmeisteri vs. P. bahiana, Andrade et al 2018; Pithecopus nordestinus vs. P. azureus, Haga et al 2017). In these cases, the authors did not find acoustic traits to distinguish the studied species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Possibly, this high similarity in sexual signals among different species promote extensive cases of hybridization between these sympatric species (Haddad, Pombal & Batistic, 1994). De Andrade et al (2018) compared calls of Phyllomedusa burmeisteri and Phyllomedusa bahiana and also defined that calls of these species cannot be distinguished by qualitative or quantitative acoustic properties. However, a focused and standardized study based in a robust data set for comparing the vocalizations among species of the Phyllomedusa burmeisteri group is still necessary for a more reliable understanding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors 13 , 16 18 have failed to separate P. bahiana and P. burmeisteri but none have taken any taxonomic approach. De Andrade et al 19 performed an acoustic and morphometric evaluation of the geographical distribution of the species Phyllomedusa burmeisteri ; but were unable to differentiate traits between P. burmeisteri and P. bahiana . Therefore, we decided to also call our studied individuals Phyllomedusa burmeisteri as it is the older name.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%