Abstract. It is difficult to select the suitable aeration system for the designers of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). In this paper, taking two WWTPs with surface aeration systems and blasting aeration respectively for an example, LCC theory was adapted to analysis the cost of consumption and the environmental impact, which caused by the different aeration system. Research results showed that: (1) In the 20-year life cycle, the LCC mainly depended on the cost of energy consumption whatever blasting aeration system or surface aeration, while the LCC of blasting aeration system affected by the equipment maintenance cost, maintenance cost, economic losses caused by wastewater loss and environmental load in maintenance period.(2) The LCC of blasting aeration system was lower than the surface aeration in general, on the premise of the standard discharge; (3) the blasting aeration system estimated a saving of 60,0000RMB annually in costs compared with the surface aeration.
IntroductionThe energy consumption of secondary treatment unit was more than 50% compared with that of the total wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) [1][2][3], the research on the choose of aeration devices has been widely attracted attention [4,5].In one WWTP using typical A 2 /O process, the energy consumption distributions of various units and equipment in the entire wastewater treatment process were analyzed [5]. The methods and solutions of energy saving potential could be put forward, and the importance of the optimal aeration system was also presented. By comparing surface aeration process and blasting aeration process in oxidation ditch WWTP, L G Shao [6] analyzed the treatment effect and energy consumption in 2010(one year) , and the results showed that: surface aeration system paid more cost than the blasting aeration system, that was about 1,300,000RMB one year in 10Wm 3 /d per day. Another typical example was illustrated by P yang [7], the same results coincided that surface aeration need cost more energy consumption than blasting aeration at the similar circumstance. In addition, Y Liang [8] carried on the research that the variation of energy consumption changed with influence of oxygenation capacity of fine bubble aerator. To reduce energy consumption of WWTP, B Kumar[9], A Thapinta [10], I Lee [11], M Jolly [12] and so on were respectively studied the oxygenation capacity of surface aeration or blasting aeration equipment.Based on the above analysis, much research had been devoted to the energy consumption of aeration equipment and obtained certain research results. However, the conclusions weren't considered