An alternative application of Rasch analysis to assess data from ophthalmic patient-reported outcome instruments

Abstract

PurposeTo highlight the potential shortcomings associated with the current use Rasch analysis for validation of ophthalmic questionnaires, and to present an alternative application of Rasch analysis to derive insights specific to the cohort of patients under investigation.MethodsAn alternative application of Rasch analysis was used to investigate the quality of vision (QoV) for a cohort of 481 patients. Patients received multifocal intraocular lenses and completed a QoV questionnaire one and twelve months post-operatively. The rating scale variant of the polytomous Rasch model was utilized. The parameters of the model were estimated using the joint maximum likelihood estimation. Analysis was performed on data at both post-operative assessments, and the outcomes were compared.ResultsThe distribution of the location of symptoms altered between assessments with the most annoyed patients completely differing. One month post-operatively, the most prevalent symptom was starbursts compared to glare at twelve months. The visual discomfort from the most annoyed patients is substantially higher at twelve months. The current most advocated approach for validating questionnaires using Rasch analysis found that the questionnaire was “Rasch-valid” one month post-operatively and “Rasch-invalid” twelve months post-operatively.ConclusionThe proposed alternative application of Rasch analysis to questionnaires can be used as an effective decision support tool at population and individual level. At population level, this new approach enables one to investigate the prevalence of symptoms across different cohorts of patients. At individual level, the new approach enables one to identify patients with poor QoV over time. This study highlights some of the potential shortcomings associated with the current use of Rasch analysis to validate questionnaires.

Reliability of Chinese web-based ocular surface disease index questionnaire in dry eye patients: a randomized, crossover study

“…The psychometric properties of C-OSDI questionnaire were analyzed utilizing Rasch analysis. Further information and background to Rasch analysis in ophthalmic research by McNeely et al [38] is recommended.…”

The prevalence of restless legs syndrome and comorbid condition among patient with type 2 diabetic mellitus visiting primary healthcare

“…To determine the internal validity of the scale, we conducted a Rasch analysis. [252627] The Rasch method is used to examine a participant's response to an item that is a function of the difference between an individual's ability and the characteristics of the item. Rasch measurement determines the relationship between the difficulty of an item and the ability of an individual.…”

“…It is expected there is a higher probability in answering easier items correctly and a lower probability in answering more difficult items incorrectly. [252627] According to the model, the probability of an individual n responding in category x to item i is given by…”

“…β n is the individual's position on the variable, δ i is the scale value (difficulty to endorse) estimated for each item i , and τ 1 , τ 2 ,..., τ 3 are the m response thresholds estimated for the m + 1 rating categories. [252627]…”

“…Testing the normality of residuals is the most frequently used goodness-of-fit measure for the Rasch model. [252627] The Rasch analysis tests how well the observed data fit the model. Misfits statistics consist of the infit and outfit test statistics which are based on the standardized residuals.…”