2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2003.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An anonymous and failure resilient fair-exchange e-commerce protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
62
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Though [7][8] [9] only a very few of these protocols concentrate on both anonymity and fair exchange aspects [4][6] [9].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though [7][8] [9] only a very few of these protocols concentrate on both anonymity and fair exchange aspects [4][6] [9].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other e-commerce fair exchange protocols i.e. protocols that are designed for the exchange of digital items (such as in [1], [2], [11], [13]) do not need a delivery agent because the items are sent electronically from the seller to the buyer through the protocol messages using computer networks. Hence, the design structure is different for the exchange of physical products and payments.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The offline TTP-based fair exchange protocols (such as in [1]- [3], [11], [13], [17]) do not rely on the TTP during the exchange of items. Rather, the parties will exchange their items directly and the TTP will be contacted in the case of dispute between the participating parties.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though the results of [17] are not directly applicable to optimistic protocols. To reduce the dependency of protocols on availability and sanity of a single TTP, distributed TTPs can be used [3,13,16]. Note that distributed TTPs in general need to ensure the consistency of their (distributed) state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%